2021
DOI: 10.3390/buildings11080364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies of Design Concepts and Energy Systems for Nearly Zero-Energy Container Buildings (NZECBs) in Different Climates

Abstract: Container-based lightweight buildings offer a high ecologic and economic potential when they are designed as nearly zero-energy container buildings (NZECBs). Thus, they are relevant to energy transition in achieving an almost climate-neutral building stock. This paper describes and applies design strategies for suitable building concepts and energy systems to be used in NZECBs for different climates. Therefore, different applications in representative climatic zones were selected. Initially, the global climate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A benchmark analysis of the two compared temporary houses was carried out by means the One click LCA online software. The LTH with a value of 152 kg CO2/m 2 emissions falls within band A, whereas the CH with a value of 348 kg CO2/m 2 emissions falls within band C, although it is necessary to specify that the sustainability value of the CH could be further increased by using recycled containers [57]. The benchmark analysis showed the high sustainability of the LTH proposed compared to similar buildings in the same region (Reggio Calabria).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A benchmark analysis of the two compared temporary houses was carried out by means the One click LCA online software. The LTH with a value of 152 kg CO2/m 2 emissions falls within band A, whereas the CH with a value of 348 kg CO2/m 2 emissions falls within band C, although it is necessary to specify that the sustainability value of the CH could be further increased by using recycled containers [57]. The benchmark analysis showed the high sustainability of the LTH proposed compared to similar buildings in the same region (Reggio Calabria).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weaknesses: Integrating biophilic design features such as living walls or extensive greenery may incur significant initial costs. Rooms exposed to the sun were not occupied in the summertime (Koke et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategic decision has contributed to the increase in the number of unused containers stored in seaports [11], causing problems associated with the allocation of space and requiring a great effort for their reallocation [9]. Currently, it is estimated that there are tens of millions of retired containers in ports around the world [8,12]. On the other hand, manufacturing new units does not eliminate the need to end the life cycle of out-of-service containers and, in this context, there are basically two options available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, manufacturing new units does not eliminate the need to end the life cycle of out-of-service containers and, in this context, there are basically two options available. The first and most obvious is recycling, given the non-degradable nature of steel [11,12]. However, melting and remanufacturing the standard 3.63 ton container requires 8000 kWh of electrical energy [13][14][15], so this is not the most sustainable option.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation