2015
DOI: 10.1049/iet-smt.2014.0189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional field computation in the design of permanent magnet motors

Abstract: This study discusses strategies for the design of permanent magnet motors (PMMs) exploiting two-dimensional (2D) and 3D field models. Five most common methodologies are compared and errors arising from 2D classical models considered. Examples comparing 2D and 3D results are presented and discussed for two selected types of motors. An approach has been put forward which allows the accuracy of classical 2D models to be improved by introducing correction coefficients arising from preliminary 3D simulations. A pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The error due to the omission of the third field component decreases as the core thickness increases (see dimension b in Figure 2a) [59]. According to the strategy discussed in [59] the obtained results by means of a 2D model have been verified by a more precise, but also more computationally-complex 3D model of the magnetic field in the exciter. The magnetic flux density distributions in the working gap δ for different lengths of this gap have been analyzed and the results of the comparison between the 2D and 3D FEM models are shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Analysis Of Magnetic Field Excitersmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The error due to the omission of the third field component decreases as the core thickness increases (see dimension b in Figure 2a) [59]. According to the strategy discussed in [59] the obtained results by means of a 2D model have been verified by a more precise, but also more computationally-complex 3D model of the magnetic field in the exciter. The magnetic flux density distributions in the working gap δ for different lengths of this gap have been analyzed and the results of the comparison between the 2D and 3D FEM models are shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Analysis Of Magnetic Field Excitersmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…As a consequence of this assumption, a two-dimensional distribution of the magnetic field in the area of the core, magnets, and air-gaps in the magnetic circuit is assumed. The error due to the omission of the third field component decreases as the core thickness increases (see dimension b in Figure 2a) [59]. According to the strategy discussed in [59] the obtained results by means of a 2D model have been verified by a more precise, but also more computationally-complex 3D model of the magnetic field in the exciter.…”
Section: Analysis Of Magnetic Field Excitersmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…where the product of loop matrices k o and k T o as well as matrix of the branch reluctances R µg represents the loop reluctance matrix, i.e., matrix R µo [28], φ is the vector of the edge values of potential A (i.e., loop fluxes of 2D RN) [22]; and Θ g is the vector of branch magnetomotive forces (mmfs). The product of the transposed loop matrix k o and the branch magnetomotive forces Θ g represents the vector of loop magnetomotive forces Θ(mmfs).…”
Section: Edge Element Model Of Inductor/choke Using Hbmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was implemented as 2D, as many authors (Wojciechowski et al , 2015) indicate that 2D analysis is sufficiently accurate for traditional PM synchronous machines (ratio of rotor length to rotor diameter is about 2, see machine datasheet in Table I). The 3D simulation is an option; it may be required in the case of skewed stator slots, different length of stator and rotor.…”
Section: Design and The Model Simulation Of Pm High-speed Synchronous Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods for calculating the magnetic flux density distribution by finite element analysis (FEA) for 2D and 3D are discussed by many authors (Krawczyk and Tegopoulos, 1993; Pyrhonen et al , 2008; Danilevich et al , 2010; Wojciechowski et al , 2015; Boguslavskii et al , 2016). In general, it is required to run 3D transient magnetic analysis with motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%