Strategies for training in diagnostic upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial

Ende, Anke; Zopf, Y; Konturek, Peter C.; Naegel, Andreas; Hahn, Eckhart G.; Matthes, Kai; Maiß, J.

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.063

Cited by 54 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thirteen studies 31 -43 investigated endoscopic procedures, including colonoscopy 36,40,43 , oesophogastroduodenoscopy 32,38,39,41 , cystourethroscopy 37 , flexible transnasal laryngoscopy 31,35 , endoscopic sinus surgery 33,42 and transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) 34 ( Table 2). Seven studies 44 -50 investigated other procedures, namely knee arthroscopy 46 , abdominal fascial closure 49 , cardiac catheterization 44 , superficial femoral artery angioplasty 47 and cataract surgery 45,48,50 (Table 3).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of the above 41 , which compared skills scores for oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, found no difference between participants who received simulation-based training (either alone or in addition to patient-based training) and those who had patient-based training alone. A further study 38 assessed competence in performing oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and reported no overall difference between groups.…”

Section: Endoscopic Procedures (7 Studies)mentioning

confidence: 98%

“…One study 40 reported an overall performance accuracy score, another 38 reported a competence score and one 41 described a skills score in a visual analogue scale rather than a global rating score; these are also reported below.…”

Section: Studies Reporting Overall Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three studies 34,41,43 reported no overall score difference between a simulation-trained group and a control group for endoscopic procedures, although in two of these 41,43 the control group was made up of participants who had patientbased training, suggesting that simulation had provided an equivalent skills transfer. One of the above 41 , which compared skills scores for oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, found no difference between participants who received simulation-based training (either alone or in addition to patient-based training) and those who had patient-based training alone.…”

Section: Endoscopic Procedures (7 Studies)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation-based training

Dawe

Pena

Windsor

et al. 2014

British Journal of Surgery

349

209

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Endoscopic Procedures (7 Studies)mentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Studies Reporting Overall Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Endoscopic Procedures (7 Studies)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation-based training

Dawe

Pena

Windsor

et al. 2014

British Journal of Surgery

349

209

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…September 16, 2014|Volume 6|Issue 9| WJGE|www.wjgnet.com Ende et al [55] 2012 28 residents OGD Simulator and observation Götzberger et al [56] 2011…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of surgical training in the era of simulation

Shaharan

Neary

2014

WJGE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AIM:To assess where we currently stand in relation to simulator-based training within modern surgical training curricula. METHODS:A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed database using keywords "simulation", "skills assessment" and "surgery". The studies retrieved were examined according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Time period reviewed was 2000 to 2013. The methodology of skills assessment was examined. RESULTS:Five hundred and fifteen articles focussed upon simulator based skills assessment. Fifty-two articles were identified that dealt with technical skills assessment in general surgery. Five articles assessed open skills, 37 assessed laparoscopic skills, 4 articles assessed both open and laparoscopic skills and 6 assessed endoscopic skills. Only 12 articles were found to be integrating simulators in the surgical training curricula. Observational assessment tools, in the form of Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) dominated the literature. CONCLUSION:Observational tools such as OSATS remain the top assessment instrument in surgical training especially in open technical skills. Unlike the aviation industry, simulation based assessment has only now begun to cross the threshold of incorporation into mainstream skills training. Over the next decade we expect the promise of simulator-based training to finally take flight and begin an exciting voyage of discovery for surgical trainees. Core tip: The nature of surgical training has teetered on the brink of a seismic change in how we can deliver the level of expertise required of a modern surgeon for over a decade. It is evolving from Halstedian's apprenticeship model towards simulation-based training similar to the aviation industry. Since 2000 there have been approximately 173 studies about validation of simulators as assessment tools. As the technology grows, its translation into real changes in curriculum is still unclear. This review is focused upon where we currently stand in relation to the effective integration of simulation-based skills assessment into modern surgical training curricula.Shaharan S, Neary P. Evaluation of surgical training in the era of simulation. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(9): 436-447 Available from:

show abstract