2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for the efficient estimation of soil organic carbon at the field scale with vis-NIR spectroscopy: Spectral libraries and spiking vs. local calibrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
32
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the predictive ability of the CSSL model on TA2 pre was also reduced when 10 spiking samples were added, compared with 5 spiking samples, as shown in Figure 5 e,f (the RPD decreased from 2.70 to 2.64). Seidel et al found a similar result; when the number of spiking samples reached 15–20, the predictive ability of the model declined due to saturation [ 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the predictive ability of the CSSL model on TA2 pre was also reduced when 10 spiking samples were added, compared with 5 spiking samples, as shown in Figure 5 e,f (the RPD decreased from 2.70 to 2.64). Seidel et al found a similar result; when the number of spiking samples reached 15–20, the predictive ability of the model declined due to saturation [ 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Guerrero et al used the KS algorithm and selected 10% of the samples from the target area as the spiking samples according to the principle of uniform distribution of the principal component scores of the spectral data [ 30 ]. Seidel et al used the KS algorithm and selected 12.5% of the samples from the target area as the spiking samples according to the principle of maximum differentiation based on the Mahalanobis distance of spectral data [ 31 ]. The results showed that these spiking samples had greatly improved the prediction accuracy of the model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They recommended performing a calibration before each measurement campaign due to the sensitivity of the method to small changes in the field conditions at sampling (e.g., moisture content, roughness, and vegetation). It has also been emphasized that bias should be calculated to evaluate model performance due to the common occurrence of a high correlation between measured and predicted values but consistent over-or underestimation (Bellon-Maurel & McBratney, 2011;Seidel, Hutengs, Ludwig, Thiele-Bruhn, & Vohland, 2019).…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operational value of SSLs lies in the ability to pull representative information (either the actual soil spectra or learnt model "rules") from them, requiring less new local samples and laboratory analysis. These methods can be summarized as augmenting SSLs with local soil samples, or spiking (Shepherd and Walsh, 2002;Brown, 2007;Wetterlind and Stenberg, 2010;Seidel et al, 2019), memory-or instance-based learning (Ramirez-Lopez et al, 2013;Gholizadeh et al, 2016), subsetting (Araújo et al, 2014;Lobsey et al, 2017) or transfer learning (Padarian et al, 2019a), which is the process of sharing intra-domain information and rules learnt by general models to a local domain (Pan and Yang, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%