Abstract:Advanced non-viral gene delivery experiments often require co-delivery of multiple nucleic acids. Therefore, the availability of reliable and robust co-transfection methods and defined selection criteria for their use in, e.g., expression of multimeric proteins or mixed RNA/DNA delivery is of utmost importance. Here, we investigated different co- and successive transfection approaches, with particular focus on in vitro transcribed messenger RNA (IVT-mRNA). Expression levels and patterns of two fluorescent prot… Show more
“…4,5 Clinical applications of mRNA include both, protein replacement therapies 6 and mRNA vaccines, 7,8 deployed not only for treatment of inherited and non-infectious acquired diseases such as cancer, 9 but also viral diseases, such as recently the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). 10,11 The latter is a showcase example for the power of mRNA technology in tackling disease, outpacing other types of vaccines, with rather fast development from bench to market. 12 Despite progress in mRNA production technology by in vitro transcription (IVT) via bacteriophage enzymes such as SP6, T3, and T7 RNA polymerases, potential immunogenicity of transcripts remains a major issue for some mRNA-based medicines.…”
“…4,5 Clinical applications of mRNA include both, protein replacement therapies 6 and mRNA vaccines, 7,8 deployed not only for treatment of inherited and non-infectious acquired diseases such as cancer, 9 but also viral diseases, such as recently the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). 10,11 The latter is a showcase example for the power of mRNA technology in tackling disease, outpacing other types of vaccines, with rather fast development from bench to market. 12 Despite progress in mRNA production technology by in vitro transcription (IVT) via bacteriophage enzymes such as SP6, T3, and T7 RNA polymerases, potential immunogenicity of transcripts remains a major issue for some mRNA-based medicines.…”
“…Herein, the former is referred to as “MonoCis (CoTF)”, while the latter is named “BiCis (2A-P)” throughout all experiments. As we previously validated the reliability of MonoCis (CoTF) approach, [ 26 ] this condition was mainly included as reference and control to determine the performance of BiCis (2A-P) method. Throughout this study a fluorescent marker protein, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, two distinct monocistronic genes could be packaged within the same carrier, and being taken up and co-expressed by the same cell. [ 25 , 26 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, two distinct monocistronic genes could be packaged within the same carrier, and being taken up and co-expressed by the same cell. [25,26] The aim of this study was to find the most reliable and robust gene co-delivery approach for simultaneous production of two proteins in the same cell, by comparing two commonly used strategies including delivery of a "bicistronic" gene versus co-delivery of two distinct "monocistronic" genes. We hypothesized that co-expression of two transgenes directly coupled by 2A-design should be most efficient to ensure predictable synthesis of both the corresponding proteins in a cell, due to the inherently equivalent molar ratio of the two genes encoded in the same open reading frame, as one transcription unit with continuous ribosomal protein synthesis.…”
Maximizing the efficiency of nanocarrier-mediated co-delivery of genes for co-expression in the same cell is critical for many applications. Strategies to maximize co-delivery of nucleic acids (NA) focused largely on carrier systems, with little attention towards payload composition itself. Here, we investigated the effects of different payload designs: co-delivery of two individual “monocistronic” NAs versus a single bicistronic NA comprising two genes separated by a 2A self-cleavage site. Unexpectedly, co-delivery via the monocistronic design resulted in a higher percentage of co-expressing cells, while predictive co-expression via the bicistronic design remained elusive. Our results will aid the application-dependent selection of the optimal methodology for co-delivery of genes.
Graphical abstract
“…In the past decades, several nanocarriers have been developed for the delivery of either mRNA, siRNA, or pDNA. Often, the carrier would show success in discrete delivery of more than one NA species with minor modifications from one species to the other [9][10][11][12]. Yet very little research has so far been dedicated to the simultaneous delivery of more than one NA species on the same carrier [13][14][15].…”
Co-delivery of different species of protein-encoding polynucleotides, e.g., messenger RNA (mRNA) and plasmid DNA (pDNA), using the same nanocarrier is an interesting topic that remains scarcely researched in the field of nucleic acid delivery. The current study hence aims to explore the possibility of the simultaneous delivery of mRNA (mCherry) and pDNA (pAmCyan) using a single nanocarrier. The latter is based on gelatin type A, a biocompatible, and biodegradable biopolymer of broad pharmaceutical application. A core-shell nanostructure is designed with a thermally stabilized gelatin–pDNA coacervate in its center. Thermal stabilization enhances the core’s colloidal stability and pDNA shielding effect against nucleases as confirmed by nanoparticle tracking analysis and gel electrophoresis, respectively. The stabilized, pDNA-loaded core is coated with the cationic peptide protamine sulfate to enable additional surface-loading with mRNA. The dual-loaded core-shell system transfects murine dendritic cell line DC2.4 with both fluorescent reporter mRNA and pDNA simultaneously, showing a transfection efficiency of 61.4 ± 21.6% for mRNA and 37.6 ± 19.45% for pDNA, 48 h post-treatment, whereas established commercial, experimental, and clinical transfection reagents fail. Hence, the unique co-transfectional capacity and the negligible cytotoxicity of the reported system may hold prospects for vaccination among other downstream applications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.