2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for selecting indicator compounds to assess attenuation of emerging contaminants during UV advanced oxidation processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Photodegradation efficiency depends on parameters such as the molar absorption coefficient (ε) and quantum yield (Φ) at the wavelength (λ) [35]. Because the photon energy of the UV irradiation applied to the water is assumed to be almost constant, the decomposition rate of the compound by UV direct photolysis is proportional to the photodegradation of the target compound, which can be defined by multiplying by ε and Φ. PhACs in group 1 have higher ε and Φ values than other groups, so they showed higher photo-degradability values [24,36].…”
Section: Categorization Of Groups Of Phacs According To Their Decomposition Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photodegradation efficiency depends on parameters such as the molar absorption coefficient (ε) and quantum yield (Φ) at the wavelength (λ) [35]. Because the photon energy of the UV irradiation applied to the water is assumed to be almost constant, the decomposition rate of the compound by UV direct photolysis is proportional to the photodegradation of the target compound, which can be defined by multiplying by ε and Φ. PhACs in group 1 have higher ε and Φ values than other groups, so they showed higher photo-degradability values [24,36].…”
Section: Categorization Of Groups Of Phacs According To Their Decomposition Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These EEM features could be used to predict the removal of CECs. Lastly, the physicochemical signal detection relies on the physiochemical reaction to light onto the sample and is highly dependent on the compounds being monitored [153]. Infrared spectroscopy was also explored to detect a low concentration of CECs.…”
Section: Light-driven Detection Of Cec In Treatment Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average E EO of the systems computed is 98.8, 5.11, 20.92, 37.18, 16.67, 2.62, and 76.80 kWh m −3 for UV only, UV/oxidant, UV/O 3 , photocatalyst, UV/Fenton, solar/Fenton, and UV/combination, respectively. UV and UV/oxidant strength and selectivity of oxidants result in certain CECs having better degradation than others [153], hence resulting in a varied computation. It was also noted that for selected studies relatively low initial concentration (<0.01 mg/L) of CECs used in the study for UV/oxidant, compared to other processes also likely contributed to the low E EO values.…”
Section: Cost-benefit Analysis Of Light-driven Aops On the Treatment Of Cecsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ace K photolysis in sunlight is very slow and ineffective [7,8] or does not occur at all [9]. UV light photolysis revealed low (LP-UV Hg lamps and MP-UV Hg lamps [10], UV-LED sources of light [11], and LP-UV Hg lamps 0.75 mW cm −2 [12]), or no (22W low pressure mercury lamps [13]) degradation efficiency. Boron-doped diamond [14], PbO 2 , and Pt [15] were found to be effective in Ace K electro-oxidation processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%