From the perspectives of the philosophy of science and statistical inference, we discuss the challenges of making prescriptive statements in quantitative research articles. We first consider the prescriptive nature of educational research and argue that prescriptive statements are a necessity in educational research. The logic of deduction, abduction, and induction in philosophy of science are briefly reviewed, and the logic of prescriptive statement is specifically considered. The inductive nature of statistical inference is examined for both classical frequentist statistics and Bayesian statistics. To conclude our discussion, we recommend conducting replications and building "research programs" in educational research. We also make recommendations on what to write in the discussion section and what evidence is required to make an appropriate prescriptive statement.Prescriptive statements frequently appear in the discussion/conclusion section of research articles and consist of recommendations about how things should be done in practice. While skimming through the issue 2, volume 102 of the Journal of Educational Psychology, we came across a very typical prescriptive statement in the first article: "The fact that the LSC had a significant impact on struggling sixth-grade readers' reported problem-solving strategy use suggests that the LSC can help struggling students in early adolescence develop at least an awareness of strategies for overcoming or at least compensating for their reading difficulties. This is particularly important, given research that suggests that problem-solving strategies are most associated with skilled reading" (Cantrell et al. 2010, p. 270); and in the third article, "Results of the current study point to technologically mediated (remote) delivery of literacy coaching as a promising alternative to the common coaching practice of in-person visits" (Powell et al. 2010, p. 310) and then Educ Psychol Rev (2011) 23:207-220