Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
50
18
14
1
Citation Types
1
65
0
0
Year Published
Range
2002
20022025
2025Publication Types
Select...
70
2
2
Relationship
1
73
Authors
Journals
Cited by 74 publications
(66 citation statements)
References 13 publications
1
65
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The vast majority of partners were contacted through provider or conditional provider notification with the patient’s approval, highlighting the importance of involving providers in the partner notification process. These results are congruent with findings from studies conducted in developed country settings that indicated the involvement of providers increases the effectiveness of partner notification efforts (Mathews et al. 2007).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The vast majority of partners were contacted through provider or conditional provider notification with the patient’s approval, highlighting the importance of involving providers in the partner notification process. These results are congruent with findings from studies conducted in developed country settings that indicated the involvement of providers increases the effectiveness of partner notification efforts (Mathews et al. 2007).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…17 We identified seven randomised trials investigating patient delivered partner therapy w1-w6 or home sampling, w8 and two trials in resource poor settings w5 w9 that have not been included in previous reviews. 4 11 12 A narrative review of US trials of expedited partner therapy, which is the term used in the United States for any method that aims to speed up treatment for sex partners without an intervening medical evaluation or counselling, reached conclusions similar to ours. 18 Effectiveness of methods to enhance patient referral Our review shows that the primary outcome in future trials of partner notification should be a reduction in infection rates because surrogate end points might be misleading.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Research
mentioning
confidence: 60%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…5 Current methods of partner notification only reach 40–60% of named sexual contacts 6 and provider referral is more successful than patient referral. 2 However, we found that provider referral was significantly less acceptable to patients than the other four options.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 71%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The vast majority of partners were contacted through provider or conditional provider notification with the patient’s approval, highlighting the importance of involving providers in the partner notification process. These results are congruent with findings from studies conducted in developed country settings that indicated the involvement of providers increases the effectiveness of partner notification efforts (Mathews et al. 2007).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…17 We identified seven randomised trials investigating patient delivered partner therapy w1-w6 or home sampling, w8 and two trials in resource poor settings w5 w9 that have not been included in previous reviews. 4 11 12 A narrative review of US trials of expedited partner therapy, which is the term used in the United States for any method that aims to speed up treatment for sex partners without an intervening medical evaluation or counselling, reached conclusions similar to ours. 18 Effectiveness of methods to enhance patient referral Our review shows that the primary outcome in future trials of partner notification should be a reduction in infection rates because surrogate end points might be misleading.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Research
mentioning
confidence: 60%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…5 Current methods of partner notification only reach 40–60% of named sexual contacts 6 and provider referral is more successful than patient referral. 2 However, we found that provider referral was significantly less acceptable to patients than the other four options.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 71%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The vast majority of partners were contacted through provider or conditional provider notification with the patient’s approval, highlighting the importance of involving providers in the partner notification process. These results are congruent with findings from studies conducted in developed country settings that indicated the involvement of providers increases the effectiveness of partner notification efforts (Mathews et al. 2007).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…17 We identified seven randomised trials investigating patient delivered partner therapy w1-w6 or home sampling, w8 and two trials in resource poor settings w5 w9 that have not been included in previous reviews. 4 11 12 A narrative review of US trials of expedited partner therapy, which is the term used in the United States for any method that aims to speed up treatment for sex partners without an intervening medical evaluation or counselling, reached conclusions similar to ours. 18 Effectiveness of methods to enhance patient referral Our review shows that the primary outcome in future trials of partner notification should be a reduction in infection rates because surrogate end points might be misleading.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Research
mentioning
confidence: 60%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…5 Current methods of partner notification only reach 40–60% of named sexual contacts 6 and provider referral is more successful than patient referral. 2 However, we found that provider referral was significantly less acceptable to patients than the other four options.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 71%