1995
DOI: 10.1177/027836499501400304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for Increasing the Tracking Region of an Eye-in-Hand System by Singularity and Joint Limit Avoidance

Abstract: An eye-in-hand system visually tracking objects can fail when the manipulator encounters a kinematic singularity or a joint limit. A solution to this problem is presented in which objects are visually tracked while the manipulator simultaneously avoids kinematic singularities and manipulator joint limits by moving in directions along which the tracking task space is unconstrained or redundant. A manipulability measure is introduced into the visual tracking objective function, providing an elegant and robust te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same applies to the avoidance of singularities where suitable indexes, such as the manipulability measure [18], can be optimized. Mixed solutions, i.e., concurrent avoidance of joint limits and singularities, have also been explored [19], as well as strategies to soften the effect of singularities when passing close to them [14], [20].…”
Section: B Differential Inverse Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same applies to the avoidance of singularities where suitable indexes, such as the manipulability measure [18], can be optimized. Mixed solutions, i.e., concurrent avoidance of joint limits and singularities, have also been explored [19], as well as strategies to soften the effect of singularities when passing close to them [14], [20].…”
Section: B Differential Inverse Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This estimation requires camera motions performed by visual servoing which can not be realized if the robot encounters a joint limit. The measure % related to this constraint (and similar to those proposed in [13] or [17]) is optimal (equal to 0) if the camera is located at the middle of the extension of each axis of the robot: …”
Section: Additional Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both self-occlusions and visibility constraints are taken into account. Contrary to others approaches [2,15] exploiting the robot redundancy, the self-occlusions and visibility constraints can be ensured even if all the robot degrees of freedom are used to realize the task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%