2016
DOI: 10.1080/0361526x.2016.1144159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for Expanding E-Journal Preservation

Abstract: The responsibility for and the initiative to preserve electronic journal content is neither clear nor easy, and knowing the preservation status of an e-journal is not a basic step within the NASIG Core Competencies for Electronic Resources Librarians life cycle of electronic resources management. Columbia and Cornell University Libraries secured funding for a project to specifically evaluate strategies for expanding e-journal preservation. A wide range of e-journal categories are evaluated within the scope of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dai rapporti e dagli studi citati in precedenza emerge che il livello di consapevolezza e di coinvolgimento delle istituzioni che si occupano del patrimonio culturale e della ricerca scientifica non sono ancora soddisfacenti. (Regan et al 2016) rilevava che solo il 30% delle riviste elettroniche aveva attuato strategie di digital preservation 46 . La ricerca della Open Preservation Foundation mostra che quasi il 19,5% delle organizzazioni intervistate non ha elaborato o pianificato una policy di digital preservation.…”
Section: Sensibilizzare E Rendere Consapevoli Le Istituzioniunclassified
“…Dai rapporti e dagli studi citati in precedenza emerge che il livello di consapevolezza e di coinvolgimento delle istituzioni che si occupano del patrimonio culturale e della ricerca scientifica non sono ancora soddisfacenti. (Regan et al 2016) rilevava che solo il 30% delle riviste elettroniche aveva attuato strategie di digital preservation 46 . La ricerca della Open Preservation Foundation mostra che quasi il 19,5% delle organizzazioni intervistate non ha elaborato o pianificato una policy di digital preservation.…”
Section: Sensibilizzare E Rendere Consapevoli Le Istituzioniunclassified
“…Current practices for selecting content for preservation can disadvantage OA content since aspects such as journal impact factors or the invested cost for content acquisition often drive such decisions (Choi & Park, 2007; Wittenberg et al, 2018). Especially in the case of small and independent OA journals, which face financial and technical barriers to preservation arrangements (Regan, 2016), it seems that the opposite approach for content selection is needed—one that also includes the most vulnerable journals instead of prioritizing prestige. Indeed, preserving the “long tail” of scholarly literature might be one of the most pressing challenges the scholarly community is facing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OA publishers may not necessarily espouse a similar imperative, and OA electronic journals have been identified as content potentially at risk of loss or, in a best-case scenario, transience (Kenney and Wesley, 2016;Luther et al, 2010;Regan, 2016;Worthey, 2009). Several analyses of OA journals found between one and four percent of titles not accessible online (Kaufman-Wills, 2005;Morris, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%