1995
DOI: 10.1016/0141-0229(94)00090-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for enzyme stabilization by intramolecular crosslinking with bifunctional reagents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That can lead to a conformational changes, and therefore to altered activity of the enzyme if these groups are in vicinity of active site. Also, it has been previously reported that glutaraldehyde had caused the denaturation of immobilized enzyme [13,31,32]. Additionally, it can be seen (Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Immobilization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…That can lead to a conformational changes, and therefore to altered activity of the enzyme if these groups are in vicinity of active site. Also, it has been previously reported that glutaraldehyde had caused the denaturation of immobilized enzyme [13,31,32]. Additionally, it can be seen (Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Immobilization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…33 The primary amino groups of both enzyme and the dendrimer possess on its surface are activated with the molecule of glutaraldehyde. 34 Hence, an intense crosslinking between dendrimer and enzyme seems to be achieved, and this multiple covalent links between the enzyme and dendrimer stabilize the quaternary structure of the protein, and also rigidity of the subunit structures is increased. 35 The intense amino groups on polyamidoamine (PAMAM) surface make the subunit structures of PyOx and GOx to involve in the immobilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, acid pH might also have a negative impact in enzyme activity. In contrast, in the pre-activated support the activity retention was about 88% (Table 1), likely due to glutaraldehyde crosslinkages as amineglutaraldehyde-amine, amine-glutaraldehydeglutaraldehyde-amine, or amine-(glutaraldehyde) n ,-amine (Fernandez-Lafuente et al 1995). It seemed that glutaraldehyde activation originated dimmers that conferred hydrophobicity to the support surface, and thus improved the retention of lipases with affinity for hydrophobic regions (Barbosa et al 2012).…”
Section: Chemical Attachment Of Lipase Onto Cammentioning
confidence: 99%