2017
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-2005-4.ch002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for Engaging Hispanic/Latino Youth in the US in Computer Science

Abstract: In the United States, Hispanic/Latino youth are underrepresented in computer science degree programs and the workforce. This chapter reviews theoretical models and empirical evidence to guide efforts to engage Hispanic/Latino youth in activities and learning environments that have the potential to increase their interest and capacity to pursue and persist in computer science. The authors advocate for a culturally responsive approach to engaging youth in computer science, and highlight a research-based program … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successful informal STEM education programs provide girls with learning environments that are physically and psychologically safe spaces where positive social norms, supportive peer and role model relationships, and a sense of belonging are developed (Simpkins, Riggs, Ngo, Vest Ettekal, & Okamoto, 2017). These learning environments support the development of disciplinary competencies, such as efficacy and skill building, by providing time and space for youth to cognitively struggle with ideas, make mistakes, and tinker with technology (Corbett & Hill, 2015; Denner, Martinez, & Thiry, 2017; Gardner‐McCune & Jimenez, 2017; Kafai et al, 2016; Khalili, Sheridan, Williams, Clark, & Stegman, 2011; Rankin & Thomas, 2017; Scott, Martin, & McAlear, 2017; Scott, Sheridan, & Clark, 2014; Simpkins et al, 2017). Youth have opportunities to engage in STEM practices, such as asking questions, communicating ideas, and drawing conclusions from evidence (Brickhouse & Potter, 2001; Carlone & Johnson, 2007; NRC, 2009; Olitsky, 2006; Painter, Jones, Tretter, & Kubasko, 2006; Polman & Miller, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful informal STEM education programs provide girls with learning environments that are physically and psychologically safe spaces where positive social norms, supportive peer and role model relationships, and a sense of belonging are developed (Simpkins, Riggs, Ngo, Vest Ettekal, & Okamoto, 2017). These learning environments support the development of disciplinary competencies, such as efficacy and skill building, by providing time and space for youth to cognitively struggle with ideas, make mistakes, and tinker with technology (Corbett & Hill, 2015; Denner, Martinez, & Thiry, 2017; Gardner‐McCune & Jimenez, 2017; Kafai et al, 2016; Khalili, Sheridan, Williams, Clark, & Stegman, 2011; Rankin & Thomas, 2017; Scott, Martin, & McAlear, 2017; Scott, Sheridan, & Clark, 2014; Simpkins et al, 2017). Youth have opportunities to engage in STEM practices, such as asking questions, communicating ideas, and drawing conclusions from evidence (Brickhouse & Potter, 2001; Carlone & Johnson, 2007; NRC, 2009; Olitsky, 2006; Painter, Jones, Tretter, & Kubasko, 2006; Polman & Miller, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%