Strategies for effective collaborative manuscript development in interdisciplinary science teams

Abstract

Science is increasingly being conducted in large, interdisciplinary teams. As team size increases, challenges can arise during manuscript development, where achieving one team goal (e.g., inclusivity) may be in direct conflict with other goals (e.g., efficiency). Here, we present strategies for effective collaborative manuscript development that draw from our experiences in an interdisciplinary science team writing collaborative manuscripts for six years. These strategies are rooted in six guiding principles that were important to our team: to create a transparent, inclusive, and accountable research team that promotes and protects team members who have less power to influence decisionmaking while fostering creativity and productivity. To help alleviate the conflicts that can arise in collaborative manuscript development, we present the following strategies: understand your team composition, create an authorship policy and discuss authorship early and often, openly announce manuscript ideas, identify and communicate the type of manuscript and lead author management style, and document and describe authorship contributions. These strategies can help reduce the probability of group conflict, uphold individual and team values, achieve fair authorship practices, and increase science productivity.

From DNA sequences to microbial ecology: Wrangling NEON soil microbe data with the neonMicrobe R package

“…Methodological and epistemological challenges involved in using these data led the authors of this paper to recognize the necessity of having a team of collaborators to validate methods and test results before formally embedding them into a standard algorithmic process. While there is some research on the social and technical factors that allow for effective team science (Rhoten 2003, Oliver et al 2018, there is room to consider how to best foster collaborations that can synthesize the wide variety of NEON data products to address interdisciplinary problems (e.g., Nagy et al 2021). Interdisciplinary collaborations have been identified as avenues for fruitful and novel research in ecology and the environment as discussed above, but especially for understanding complex socioenvironmental issues (Palmer et al 2016).…”

Conceptual models for implementing solution-oriented team science in large research consortia

“…Writing teams engage in three key teamwork processes: team formation, team engagement, and team functioning. Team formation can involve (a) leadership [3], i.e., how the leaders address team member motivation or help to guide the process of developing the team's scientific priorities [6]; (b) team composition, i.e., team size, diversity, disciplines, and presence of brokers [3]; and (c) work distribution, i.e., how the team establishes roles and responsibilities [27]. Team engagement refers to the virtual or in-person approaches that writing teams implement to generate solutionoriented research, including development of analysis proposals and manuscripts.…”

The Effect of Heterogeneity and Leadership on Innovation Performance: Evidence from University Research Teams in China

“…The impact of cognition on innovation is based on the emotions of scientists [13]. Science and mood are usually in juxtaposition because people generally think that science is rational, while emotions are irrational, and thus unconducive to scientific research [18,19]. However, studies have shown that there is a positive correlation between emotion and scientific research.…”