2019
DOI: 10.1353/rhe.2019.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Stories: Analysis of Prior Learning Assessment Policy Narratives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, while the NPF has previously been used to analyze policy narratives around charter schools (Ertas 2015), prior learning assessments in higher education (Price 2019), and narrative categorizations of evidence in student assessments (Schlaufer 2018), it has not been widely applied in the education policy domain. As NPF scholars work to understand the nuance of policy narratives in a diverse range of settings, education policy can provide an untapped market to test and evolve NPF concepts and hypotheses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, while the NPF has previously been used to analyze policy narratives around charter schools (Ertas 2015), prior learning assessments in higher education (Price 2019), and narrative categorizations of evidence in student assessments (Schlaufer 2018), it has not been widely applied in the education policy domain. As NPF scholars work to understand the nuance of policy narratives in a diverse range of settings, education policy can provide an untapped market to test and evolve NPF concepts and hypotheses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NPF scholars have taken on this challenge, creating several new operationalizations of plot. For example, scholars have defined plot as the recognition of a policy problem (Lawlor & Crow, 2018; Price, 2019), the connection of these problems to their cause (Crow & Jones, 2018; Kuhlmann & Blum, 2021; Lawlor & Crow, 2018), beginning‐middle‐end stories (Boscarino, 2019; Honeck, 2018; Nisbett, 2017), and a two‐dimensional variable that analyzes policy outcomes and time elements (Ruff et al., 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%