Strategic selection

Powell, Emilia Justyna; Wiegand, Krista E.

doi:10.1177/0022343313508969

Cited by 17 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Partial settlement should be associated with the resolution of remaining disagreements. Powell and Wiegand (2014) have explained 'regime type/rule of law' model to resolve territorial disputes illustrating that high rule of law states are more likely to return to the international binding venues only if they have a positive experience with arbitration and adjudication. On the other hand, low rule of law states are not concerned with their record of successes/failures when resorting to international binding venues.…”

Section: Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Important Factors Applicable in Bilateral Relationships and Conflict Resolution

Rayamajhi

2023

J. APF Command & Staff Coll.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Important factors applicable in bilateral relationships and conflict resolution are strategies, models, theories, and policies. In simple term, strategy is a long-term plan intended to achieve. An example to follow or imitate is a model. An idea to justify a course of action is a theory whereas law, regulation, and procedure used is a policy. Strategy embodies interest based priorities, which has short, medium, and long-term implications for a country. Model gives template that guides in constructing a system. Theory is essential tool for state craft. Guidance, constancy, accountability, efficiency, and clarity on how an organization operates are provided by policies. The objective of the paper is to examine important factors applicable in bilateral relationships and conflict resolution and highlight important relevant factors. To prepare the paper, qualitative methodology, explanatory research design, descriptive and analytical study design, and secondary sources of related textual and virtual documents are used. .After discussion, relevant strategies of ‘progressive nationalism, frequent dialogues and visits at high level, border diplomacy, pushing into regular constructive dialogues, playing diplomatic roles by a third country, and using International Boundary Research Unit (IBRU);’ models of ‘geo-economic and territorial project model of cross-border integration, bilateral trade flows, and partial settlement in resolving disputes;’ theories of ‘FDI inflow and bilateral political relationships, problem workshops, creation of international regime, and international organizations (IOs) brokered bargaining;’ and policies of ‘bilateral relationships, defense diplomacy, bilateral economic relations, bilateral diplomacy, nonalignment with equal friendships for all and diversification, an equal and respectful but not reciprocal relationships, leaders’ visits and diplomatic conflicts, third party intermediaries, enduring rivalries, pursuit of legal settlement, compromise or escalation or maintenance of status quo or swapping of territory, and uti possidentis or ground realities are highlighted to be adopted by the governments.

show abstract

Section: Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Important Factors Applicable in Bilateral Relationships and Conflict Resolution

Rayamajhi

2023

J. APF Command & Staff Coll.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The first is to define the terms of the exchange. In the context of a territorial exchange resulting from a re-demarcation process between two countries, it is crucial to clearly define the terms of the exchange (Powell & Wiegand, 2014). A clear definition entails specifying the precise areas that will be exchanged and considering relevant factors such as land value and the rights of the people residing in the affected area.…”

Section: The Solutions To the Issue Of Indonesia-malaysia Boundary Li...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Unsettled Agreement of the 2019 Re-Demarcation of the Indonesia-Malaysia Boundary Line’s Impact

Nurdin,

Sudjito,

Arsana

2023

IJOMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Referring to the principle of uti possidetis juris, the establishment of the boundary line on Sebatik Island was based on a previous agreement between the Netherlands and the British. It was stated in the 1915 Agreement between the Netherlands and the British, which declared that the boundary line follows a parallel line of 4º10' North Latitude. Unfortunately, The Boundary Agreement of 1915 does not mention the datum and reference ellipsoid used to determine the abovementioned 4° 10' North Latitude. The absence of a datum and reference ellipsoid causes disputes in determining the precise location of boundary pillars during the field reconstruction procedure. A joint survey between Indonesia and Malaysia in 1983 found that most of the boundary pillars on Sebatik Island were not precisely located along the 4° 10' North Latitude line and based on the results of the 10th meeting of the Joint Working Group on the Outstanding Boundary Problems in 2018, Indonesia and Malaysia agreed to re-demarcate the boundary, which was carried out in 2019. This study aims to determine the impact of the 2019 re-demarcation of the boundary line between Indonesia and Malaysia on Sebatik Island. The methods applied in this research are in-depth interviews, observation, and document studies. The results found that the 2019 re-demarcation resulted in exchanging areas between Indonesia and Malaysia. This area exchange generates uncertainty about land ownership by citizens in border zones.

show abstract

Islamic Law States and Peaceful Resolution of Territorial Disputes

Powell

2015

Int Org

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article argues that specific characteristics of the domestic legal institutions of Islamic law states shape these states' choices of peaceful resolution methods in territorial disputes. After providing original data on the characteristics of Islamic legal structures, I systematically compare pertinent rules of international dispute resolution methods and Islamic law. I demonstrate empirically that not all Islamic law states view international settlement venues in the same way. Secular legal features, such as constitutional mentions of education, supreme court, or peaceful settlement of disputes have the power to attract these states to the most formal international venues—arbitration and adjudication. On the other hand, Islamic law states whose legal system is infused with Islamic religious precepts are attracted to less-formalized venues.

show abstract

Strategic selection

Cited by 17 publications

References 41 publications

Important Factors Applicable in Bilateral Relationships and Conflict Resolution

Important Factors Applicable in Bilateral Relationships and Conflict Resolution

The Unsettled Agreement of the 2019 Re-Demarcation of the Indonesia-Malaysia Boundary Line’s Impact

Islamic Law States and Peaceful Resolution of Territorial Disputes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About