2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-5039-3_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Quality Management of Aero Gas Turbine Engines, Applying Functional Resonance Analysis Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aerospace 2020, 7, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 24 (1) The fail-safe principle [22] mandates that the system design should prevent or mitigate the unsafe consequences of the failure of a system; (2) The safety margin principle [23] requires that features be put in place to maintain the operational conditions and the associated hazard level at some "distance" away from the estimated critical hazard threshold or accident-triggering threshold; (3) The ungraduated response principle [24] posits that the first course of action to explore for accident prevention and mitigation is the possibility of eliminating a hazard altogether, regardless of the extent of its belligerence, using creativity and technical ingenuity (4) The defence-in-depth principle [25][26][27] calls for safety protection by means of multiple lines of defences or safety barriers along the potential accident sequences. (5) The observability-in-depth principle [26,27] requires that various features be put in place to observe and monitor for the system state and breaches of any safety barrier, and reliably provide this feedback to the operators, so that all safety-degrading events or states (that the safety barriers are meant to protect against) are observable.…”
Section: System Safety Principles and The Seven-principles-frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Aerospace 2020, 7, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 24 (1) The fail-safe principle [22] mandates that the system design should prevent or mitigate the unsafe consequences of the failure of a system; (2) The safety margin principle [23] requires that features be put in place to maintain the operational conditions and the associated hazard level at some "distance" away from the estimated critical hazard threshold or accident-triggering threshold; (3) The ungraduated response principle [24] posits that the first course of action to explore for accident prevention and mitigation is the possibility of eliminating a hazard altogether, regardless of the extent of its belligerence, using creativity and technical ingenuity (4) The defence-in-depth principle [25][26][27] calls for safety protection by means of multiple lines of defences or safety barriers along the potential accident sequences. (5) The observability-in-depth principle [26,27] requires that various features be put in place to observe and monitor for the system state and breaches of any safety barrier, and reliably provide this feedback to the operators, so that all safety-degrading events or states (that the safety barriers are meant to protect against) are observable.…”
Section: System Safety Principles and The Seven-principles-frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FRAMED-IN-FRAM ® diagram is an improved version of the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) diagram [32], developed by the authors. Interested readers are referred to Thomas, et al [1,2] for further information on the FRAMED-IN-FRAM ® diagram. The FRAMED-IN-FRAM ® diagram for the SRK framework, presented in Figure 6, shows how the behaviour and control, based on the three levels of skill, rule and knowledge, works through signals, signs and symbols of perceptual, conceptual and explicit nature respectively.…”
Section: Skill-rule-knowledge Framework and Macro-meso-micro Perspective Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations