2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic purchasing and health systems resilience: Lessons from COVID-19 in selected European countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, they are in stark contrast to how the health sector responded in high-income countries, in particular, by adjusting their payment methods, backed by additional funding, although with a closer look, there were also variations found within this country group. One commonality with high-income countries, however, relates to the rather passive role of purchasers, such as under social health insurance schemes, in COVID-19-related decision-making in purchasing ( Montás et al ., 2022 ; Schmidt et al ., 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, they are in stark contrast to how the health sector responded in high-income countries, in particular, by adjusting their payment methods, backed by additional funding, although with a closer look, there were also variations found within this country group. One commonality with high-income countries, however, relates to the rather passive role of purchasers, such as under social health insurance schemes, in COVID-19-related decision-making in purchasing ( Montás et al ., 2022 ; Schmidt et al ., 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, in European countries, a key policy response was to ensure that COVID-19 health services were free of charge ( Thomson et al ., 2022 ). Moreover, governments and public payers assumed most of the COVID-19-related financial risks of providers ( Montás et al ., 2022 ; Schmidt et al ., 2022 ; Waitzberg et al ., 2022 ), as in many countries hospitals received their usual budgets or additional funds to compensate for revenue shortfalls ( Quentin et al ., 2020 ). Overall, the evidence shows that the structure and financing of health systems affected the capacity of providers to cope with the pandemic ( Waitzberg et al ., 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COVID-19 pandemic critically impacted purchasing patterns and in many countries, purchasing decisions were partly centralised to federal governments, especially regarding public health services. 57 Many decisions involved a trade-off between the so-called precautionary principle and dynamic efficiency. The former, in this context, refers to the application of restrictive and/or costly measures (eg, reserve capacities in hospitals, broad testing campaigns) when conclusive evidence on their effectiveness is still lacking.…”
Section: Bmj Public Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29] incorporate 7 possible implications of economic effects from COVID-19 in the European economies and found that declining reproductive rate and average GDP shortfall were of the greater concerns in the region. Intuitively, literature across economics and development studies have found various negative effects of COVID-19 across sectors ( [30] on the banking sector; [31] on the water sector regulation; [32] on the marine sector management; [33] on the mental healthcare reforms; [34] on the childcare sector; [35] on the economic effects of livelihoods; [36] on the broadband sector). Mostly observations till date from prevalent body of literature suggest that existence of pandemics and its associated uncertainty have busted economic growth negatively in varied forms across the globe [ 25 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%