1999
DOI: 10.1080/10696679.1999.11501827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Procurement Planning across the Product’s Sales Cycle: A Conceptualization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the maturity stage, not only organizations' growth continues increasing but at a decreasing rate relative to its rate in the rapid growth stage, but also demand and return rate become more stable (Jawahar & McLaughlin, 2001;Laan & Salomon, 1997;Rink & Fox, 1999). Although growth rate has slowed, organizations at this stage have more market power as well as market share (Pashley & Philippatos, 1990), which encourages them to adopt a risk-averse strategy and focus more on profitability (Elsayed & Paton, 2005;Jawahar & McLaughlin, 2001).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the maturity stage, not only organizations' growth continues increasing but at a decreasing rate relative to its rate in the rapid growth stage, but also demand and return rate become more stable (Jawahar & McLaughlin, 2001;Laan & Salomon, 1997;Rink & Fox, 1999). Although growth rate has slowed, organizations at this stage have more market power as well as market share (Pashley & Philippatos, 1990), which encourages them to adopt a risk-averse strategy and focus more on profitability (Elsayed & Paton, 2005;Jawahar & McLaughlin, 2001).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Narasimhan et al, (2006) proposed a research model which emphasized the influence of product life cycle on selection of suppliers. The study of Rink and Fox (1999) contended that managers should change their approach to procurement based on stage in product life cycle.…”
Section: H1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change has been driven by increasingly complex product choices, heightened use of technology, a switch in focus from cost to best value, and in line with this paper's perspective, an increased consideration of environmental issues [Zheng et al, 2007;Beukers et al, 2006;Paulraj et al, 2006;Gelderman, van Weele, 2005;McCue, Gianakis, 2001;Cavinato, 1999;Reck, Long, 1988;Caddick, Dale, 1987]. Many authors agree that procurement has become increasingly recognized at the corporate level with some suggesting that it should be considered equally important like other strategically significant functions such as marketing, finance, and operations [Paulraj et al, 2006;Cavinato, 1999;Rink, Fox, 1999;McIvor et al, 1997]. Despite this, it has been observed that public sector procurement is still focused on reducing transaction costs and fails to consider the total acquisition costs of products [Staples, Dalrymple, 2011].…”
Section: Public and Private Sector Strategic Procurementmentioning
confidence: 71%