2020
DOI: 10.1177/1747021820960712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic prioritisation enhances young and older adults’ visual feature binding in working memory

Abstract: Visual working memory for features and bindings is susceptible to age-related decline. Two experiments were used to examine whether older adults are able to strategically prioritise more valuable information in working memory and whether this could reduce age-related impairments. Younger (18–33 years) and older (60–90 years) adults were presented with coloured shapes and, following a brief delay, asked to recall the feature that had accompanied the probe item. In Experiment 1, participants were either asked to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
31
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(229 reference statements)
9
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With the sequences containing three objects, it is notable that those presented at the middle position were relatively vulnerable in working memory. This pattern is consistent with earlier work using the same sequence length (Brown et al, 2017;Allen, Atkinson, & Nicholls, 2020). Generally, sequential presentation is challenging because it requires working memory resources, including internal/goal-directed attention, to be redistributed in order to encode newer stimuli (Gorgoraptis et al, 2011), while also retaining earlier items (Hitch, Allen, & Baddeley, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…With the sequences containing three objects, it is notable that those presented at the middle position were relatively vulnerable in working memory. This pattern is consistent with earlier work using the same sequence length (Brown et al, 2017;Allen, Atkinson, & Nicholls, 2020). Generally, sequential presentation is challenging because it requires working memory resources, including internal/goal-directed attention, to be redistributed in order to encode newer stimuli (Gorgoraptis et al, 2011), while also retaining earlier items (Hitch, Allen, & Baddeley, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The observed decrease in VSWM efficiency in GrE1 compared to GrY1 is consistent with data from other studies of age-related differences in visual-spatial memory [4,[40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Age Differences In Visuospatial Short-term Memory and Time Dynamic During Trainingsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Forsberg, Johnson and Logie [ 61 ] proposed that difference in feature binding between young and older adults may be attributed to the use of different cognitive strategies, suggesting different neural backgrounds [ 62 ]. On the same page, Allen, Atkinson and Nicholls [ 63 ] supported that strategic prioritization plays an important role in feature binding, as even if older adults have worsened WM in general, they preserve the ability to strategically direct their attention to more important items in WM, stressing the significance of cognitive strategies in feature binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%