Strategic Multi‐Stakeholder Trade Studies

Emes, Michael

doi:10.1002/inst.200710117

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A supported structured approach will provide a documented rationale for decision-making and provide justification for stakeholders. It will also facilitate the allocation of technology planning knowledge within the organisation [7]. The Pugh Matrix was found sufficient and effective toward both these objectives.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Trade Study of Alternative Controls and Power Distribution Architecture in Subsea Processing

Eide¹,

Haskins

2016

INCOSE International Symp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports on a trade study of feasible concept alternatives for control and low voltage power distribution architecture for subsea process stations. Subsea gas compression is a new process station technology that is responding to the market need for extending the lifetime of existing subsea gas fields. These subsea process stations are deployed in deeper water, farther offshore and in harsher environments. The demand for a more efficient, less complex, and cheaper solution is pushing the technology development and screening for alternative concepts. The SPADE methodology has guided a trade study of concept opportunity exploration for alternative distribution architectures. The Pugh matrix demonstrated its ability to provide a simple overview of the multiple factors in a decisionmaking situation, with extensions for risk and opportunity assessment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Trade Study of Alternative Controls and Power Distribution Architecture in Subsea Processing

Eide¹,

Haskins

2016

INCOSE International Symp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…During a three-year research project investigating technology management in instrumentation supply chains 1 , we developed a method for planning new multi-stakeholder technology developments in which we scored each solution concept according to its effectiveness from the perspective of each stakeholder against each of their requirements, and weighed these against implementation factors of cost, risk and time to deliver (Emes 2007). In this, we incorporated Technology Roadmapping (Phaal et al 2003) and Scenario Planning (van der Heijden 1996) to help plan for a technology development in an uncertain future.…”

Section: Figure 2 Seek Alternative Systems Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Principles of Systems Engineering Management: Reflections From 45 Years of Spacecraft Technology Research and Development at the Mullard Space Science Laboratory

Emes¹,

Smith²,

James³

et al. 2017

INSIGHT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on 45 years of experience conducting research and development into spacecraft instrumentation and 13 years experience teaching systems engineering in a range of industries, the Mullard Space Science Laboratory at UCL has identified a set of guiding principles that have been invaluable in delivering successful projects in the most demanding of environments. The five principles are: ‘principles govern process,’ ‘seek alternative systems perspectives,’ ‘understand the enterprise context,’ ‘integrate systems engineering and project management,’ and ‘invest in the early stages of projects.’ A common thread behind the principles is a desire to foster the ability to anticipate and respond to a changing environment with a constant focus on achieving long‐term value for the enterprise. These principles applied in space projects have been spun‐out to non‐space projects (primarily through UCL's Centre for Systems Engineering). They are in UCL's extensive teaching and professional training programme.

show abstract

Section: Principle 2: Seek Alternative Systems Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

8.1.2 Principles of Systems Engineering Management: Reflections from 45 years of spacecraft technology research and development at the Mullard Space Science Laboratory

Emes¹,

Smith²,

James³

et al. 2012

INCOSE International Symp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on 45 years of experience conducting research and development into spacecraft instrumentation and 13 years' experience teaching Systems Engineering in a range of industries, the Mullard Space Science Laboratory at University College London (UCL) has identified a set of guiding principles that have been invaluable in delivering successful projects in the most demanding of environments. The five principles are: ‘principles govern process’, ‘seek alternative systems perspectives’, ‘understand the enterprise context’, ‘integrate systems engineering and project management’, and ‘invest in the early stages of projects’. A common thread behind the principles is a desire to foster the ability to anticipate and respond to a changing environment with a constant focus on achieving long‐term value for the enterprise. These principles are applied in space projects and have been spun‐out to non‐space projects (primarily through UCL's Centre for Systems Engineering). They are also embedded in UCL's extensive teaching and professional training programme.

show abstract

Strategic Multi‐Stakeholder Trade Studies

Cited by 7 publications

References 9 publications

Trade Study of Alternative Controls and Power Distribution Architecture in Subsea Processing

Trade Study of Alternative Controls and Power Distribution Architecture in Subsea Processing

Principles of Systems Engineering Management: Reflections From 45 Years of Spacecraft Technology Research and Development at the Mullard Space Science Laboratory

8.1.2 Principles of Systems Engineering Management: Reflections from 45 years of spacecraft technology research and development at the Mullard Space Science Laboratory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About