2012
DOI: 10.1057/9780230349438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Management and Public Service Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(11 reference statements)
2
75
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, future work should integrate the development of these perspectives, considering their effects on the performance -both anticipated and un-anticipated (we realize definitions may not be simple and may require further methodological work) of the public organizations concerned (see earlier work by Andrews et al 2009Andrews et al , 2012.…”
Section: Future Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, future work should integrate the development of these perspectives, considering their effects on the performance -both anticipated and un-anticipated (we realize definitions may not be simple and may require further methodological work) of the public organizations concerned (see earlier work by Andrews et al 2009Andrews et al , 2012.…”
Section: Future Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nevertheless, SM had shaped public-sector with a strong positive impact on various aspects of this sector performance, it also generated many changes across POs to enhance their performance (Pollitt & Bouckaert, 2011;Andrews, Boyne, Law, & Walker. 2012).…”
Section: Public Reform and Strategic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such structures are expected to make it more opportune for managers to pay attention to strategic aspects such as competing actors, client needs and financial stability. Studies have also associated strategic management in public organizations with desired organizational outcomes (Moore, ; Poister, Pitts and Edwards, ) and positive effects of strategy on performance (Andrews et al ., ). However, others have raised concerns about NPM reforms because of unintended effects such as opportunistic behaviour, gaming and collective action problems (Andersen and Serritzlew, ; Christensen and Lægreid, ; Le Grand, ; Soss, Fording and Schram, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%