Strategic interdependence in capacity expansion: A spatial analysis for port infrastructure services

Hidalgo-Gallego, Soraya; Núñez‐Sánchez, Ramón; Coto-Millán, Pablo

doi:10.1016/j.tra.2020.11.012

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the current literature considers the utilization of GIS as a primary basis of the typical strategies in the context of environmental, economic and social aspects, this research introduces the fourth dimension of engineering. Although, the traditional bottom line elements can encompass the engineering elements of a major infrastructure project, however, the level of service delivery to the user is measured by the infrastructure performance such as system reliability and service delivery, which are important to the user, when the system is in operation (Hidalgo-Gallego et al , 2021; Tian et al , 2021). The performance assessment is used by the user as a guide to satisfaction (Li et al , 2021; Nair and Bhat, 2021).…”

Section: Research Setting and Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Utilization of adaptive methodology to underpin rail transportation systems: Sydney metro’s methodical formulation

Gharehbaghi

McManus

Myers

2021

JEDT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose As a part of adaptive and complex system thinking, geographic information systems (GIS) are beneficial particularly for transportation projects, where uncertainty is frequent. Accordingly, this paper aims to examine the utilization of GIS in line with adaptive and complex system thinking, as the basis of the methodical formulation of perceived gaps within the integrated transportation planning (ITP) specifically for the mega transportation projects. Such a framework is undertaken, as the mega transportation projects although may seem straightforward, however, are problematic and require more consideration than the traditional triple bottom line factors. Using the Sydney Metro as the case study, the outcome demonstrates the significance of the fourth separate dimension of engineering into the aforementioned bottom-line factors. Design/methodology/approach The research examines the utilization of adaptive and complex system thinking, as the basis of the methodical formulation of perceived gaps within the ITP. The use of Sydney’s Metro project is a novel example of the proposed methodical formulation and its empirical assessment and provides a better understanding of the use of mapping and planning tools for mega transportation projects. Findings Aptly, using the developed conceptual framework, this research further validates the inclusion of a separate engineering dimension with the usual triple bottom line factors. Such inclusion is paramount in responding to the existing ITP gaps found within the current literature. Originality/value This research uses GIS and ITP process to support the aforementioned adaptive and complex system thinking. This, in turn, is used as the basis of a methodical formulation framework in dealing with mega rail transportation infrastructure. To support such a proposition, Sydney Metro is examined as the basis of a case study.

show abstract

Section: Research Setting and Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Utilization of adaptive methodology to underpin rail transportation systems: Sydney metro’s methodical formulation

Gharehbaghi

McManus

Myers

2021

JEDT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Further such systems, as a whole, are intended to be maintained indefinitely, and subject to ongoing and continuous replacement and refurbishment of their components [4,5]. Generally, infrastructure can be split into two different categories: (a) hard, which includes, water, gas, electricity, waste, and transport provision (roads, rail, air); and (b) soft, which provides actions and support via strategies and plans [6][7][8][9][10]. Both categories support communities while encouraging various economic, social, and environmental activists to respond to current and future needs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Challenges in Determining the Scope of Rail Megaprojects: Responding to Ever-Increasing Infrastructure Demand

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While megaprojects can be defined as highly complex, time-consuming, and cost-intensive endeavors, for rail infrastructures they are even more problematic. As a starting point, for rail megaprojects, their scope may, at times, alter due to some risks and uncertainties. As many such projects exceed many years in development, their scope and formation will not be a linear trajectory. It is, therefore, the aim of this paper to evaluate the difficulties in determining the scope of rail megaprojects. This paper first introduces the theoretical framework via adaptive decision-making and policy setting when dealing with mega rail projects. Through sustainable development, carefully applied research is undertaken to highlight some of the key shortfalls of current practices when dealing with mega rail projects. This includes categorizing sustainability into four dimensions: social, economic, environmental, and engineering for rail infrastructure. To address the existing gap in the literature, including the appropriate alignment of policy planning and design, this paper will carefully review the complex science of rail megaprojects. This can be seen as a conceptual framework, which combines complex theory and practice to develop a theoretical perspective to initiate, plan, execute, and commission mega rail projects. Particularly with an international focus, this paper will review global development, targeting rail infrastructures. For rail megaprojects, strategically integrated objectives are traditionally key functions within the regional land transport network along with the national network and are necessary to (i) improve connectivity, both nationally and inter-regionally for people, communities, regions, and industry via effectively linking the existing broad-based transport network; (ii) enhance logistical systems and trade; (iii) provide a consistent framework for continuous sustainable development; and (iv) provide a consistent framework for long-term economic and social benefits.

show abstract

“…A schematic view of three stages taking place at the port area. To address this issue, port managers usually adopt these strategies: (1) expanding investment, such as channel widening, increasing the number of berths and loading equipment [4]; (2) optimizing the loading operation planning [5]; and (3) scheduling vessel traffic scheme [6]. The first strategy does not provide a solution for all ports, particularly those involving fast-changing market demands in a short period.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative optimization for loading operation planning and vessel traffic scheduling in dry bulk ports

Zhang

Yang

et al. 2022

Advanced Engineering Informatics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Strategic interdependence in capacity expansion: A spatial analysis for port infrastructure services

Cited by 5 publications

References 30 publications

Utilization of adaptive methodology to underpin rail transportation systems: Sydney metro’s methodical formulation

Utilization of adaptive methodology to underpin rail transportation systems: Sydney metro’s methodical formulation

Challenges in Determining the Scope of Rail Megaprojects: Responding to Ever-Increasing Infrastructure Demand

Collaborative optimization for loading operation planning and vessel traffic scheduling in dry bulk ports

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About