2012
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2011.637074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic intent, high-performance HRM, and the role of the HR director: an investigation into attitudes and practices in the country of Jordan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not HR managers but middle/line managers who are directly responsible for supervising staff and thus for implementing HR decisions and influencing employee perceptions and performance (Singh et al, 2012;Sheehan et al, 2014). Interactions between line managers and subordinate employees are crucial given that they are normally the implementers of employment policies and practices including pay, discipline, and performance (Guest et.al, 2013;Kuvass et al, 2014;Woodrow and Guest, 2014;Brewster et.al, 2015;Gilbert et.al, 2015).…”
Section: Implementing Hr Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is not HR managers but middle/line managers who are directly responsible for supervising staff and thus for implementing HR decisions and influencing employee perceptions and performance (Singh et al, 2012;Sheehan et al, 2014). Interactions between line managers and subordinate employees are crucial given that they are normally the implementers of employment policies and practices including pay, discipline, and performance (Guest et.al, 2013;Kuvass et al, 2014;Woodrow and Guest, 2014;Brewster et.al, 2015;Gilbert et.al, 2015).…”
Section: Implementing Hr Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With some exceptions (e.g., Welbourne and Cyr, 1999;Hope Hailey et al, 2005;Singh et al, 2012;Martin and Gollan, 2012;Sheehan et al, 2014;Chadwick et al, 2016), most studies of the so-called "black box" of the HRM -performance relationship focus upon HR practices (processes/systems/policies/strategies), rather than the role played by the HR department in making strategic HR decisions. On the other hand, the stream of research that focuses on the influence of HR department/professionals on strategic decision making on the board (e.g., Ulrich and Brockbank, 2005;Kelly and Gennard, 2007;Charan et al, 2015) tends to exclude a more indepth consideration of HR practices and their relationship to firm performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Largely, the research in this area in particular had been concerned with evaluating the level of strategic HR involvement and HR devolution rather than measuring their direct impacts on performance (see,for example, Budhwar& Sparrow, 1997; Khatri, 1999;Budhwar, 2000;Andersen et al, 2007;Othman, 2009, Singh et al, 2012a.…”
Section: Hrm and Organisational Performance (Op)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If people are an organisation's most valued asset and have to be deployed optimally in order to achieve organisation goals, then, in order to do so, they have to be effectively involved and integrated within the strategic activities of the firm; again, it could be argued that the day-to-day HR issues to Line Managers may free-up the HR department to concentrate on issues of strategy (Cunningham and Hyman, 1999;Budhwar, 2000;Singh et al, 2012a). More closely linking the HR function with the organisation's strategic decision-making process recognises the importance of effective and efficient HRM in obtaining enduring competitive advantage (Budhwar, 2000;Truss et al, 1997).…”
Section: Strategy Hr Involvement and Hr Devolvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation