2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic environmental assessment as an approach to assess waste management systems. Experiences from an Austrian case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar result was obtained by Eriksson et al (2004) considering the installation of an anaerobic digestion plant. While, different results were obtained by Salhofer et al (2007), who found lower impact in terms of the Eutrophication of mechanical biological treatment rather than incineration. The avoided impact is due to the energy recovery with the subsequent saving of fossil fuels.…”
Section: Acidification/eutrophicationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…A similar result was obtained by Eriksson et al (2004) considering the installation of an anaerobic digestion plant. While, different results were obtained by Salhofer et al (2007), who found lower impact in terms of the Eutrophication of mechanical biological treatment rather than incineration. The avoided impact is due to the energy recovery with the subsequent saving of fossil fuels.…”
Section: Acidification/eutrophicationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In describing the study and the scenarios for evaluation and comparison, the criteria used to define the assumed scenarios are not clear, specifically with respect to the choice of certain waste management options as regards both the percentages of waste involved and the technologies and processes chosen [19,[21][22][23][24][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• (ii) Other studies were conducted on LCA applications for civil and construction products' selection. Aforementioned tools were considered highly effective in the environmental impact assessment for a single industrial product (Boehm et al, 1995;Durairaj et al, 2002;Forsberg and Von Malmborg, 2004;Gluch and Baumann, 2004;Hischier et al, 2014;Li, 2006;Salhofer et al, 2007). In applying the tools to the construction industry, however, it was limited to provide only a simple summation of the life-cycle environmental impact assessment (Jeong et al, in press;Mateus and Bragança, 2011;Norris and Yost, 2001;Yu-rong et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%