Abstract:Within the scope of the new Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union, in coherence with other EU policies, new incentives are developed for farmers to deploy practices that are beneficial for climate, water, soil, air, and biodiversity. Such practices include establishment of multifunctional biomass production systems, designed to reduce environmental impacts while providing biomass for food, feed, bioenergy, and other biobased products. Here, we model three scenarios of large-scale deployment for two … Show more
“…Poplars as alleys or buffer zones strategically placed between fields with annual crops and ditches, rivers, lakes in agricultural landscapes would significantly reduce flow of nutrients leaching to watercourses. 16 Further advantages with fast-growing trees comprise reduced N 2 O emissions to atmosphere; 69,70 reduced soil erosion caused by surface water runoff, 71 tillage, or wind; 72 reduced carbon loss from agricultural soils; 73 and increased biodiversity. 74,75 Currently, 34.5 M ha fertile agricultural land is used to produce the annual demand of 26.2 M tonnes cotton fiber.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 In addition to wood production, Populus plantations provide other ecosystem services in terms of enhanced biodiversity, 14 the ability to utilize transiently high amounts of water for growth in a changing climate with extreme rainfalls, and in the accumulation of nutrients leached from adjacent agricultural soils. 15,16 This multifunctionality makes SRF with Populus an important tool to increase ecosystem resilience and contributes to the actions for climate neutrality proposed by the European Green Deal. [17][18][19] Conversion of lignocellulose to textile fiber requires pulping.…”
“…Poplars as alleys or buffer zones strategically placed between fields with annual crops and ditches, rivers, lakes in agricultural landscapes would significantly reduce flow of nutrients leaching to watercourses. 16 Further advantages with fast-growing trees comprise reduced N 2 O emissions to atmosphere; 69,70 reduced soil erosion caused by surface water runoff, 71 tillage, or wind; 72 reduced carbon loss from agricultural soils; 73 and increased biodiversity. 74,75 Currently, 34.5 M ha fertile agricultural land is used to produce the annual demand of 26.2 M tonnes cotton fiber.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 In addition to wood production, Populus plantations provide other ecosystem services in terms of enhanced biodiversity, 14 the ability to utilize transiently high amounts of water for growth in a changing climate with extreme rainfalls, and in the accumulation of nutrients leached from adjacent agricultural soils. 15,16 This multifunctionality makes SRF with Populus an important tool to increase ecosystem resilience and contributes to the actions for climate neutrality proposed by the European Green Deal. [17][18][19] Conversion of lignocellulose to textile fiber requires pulping.…”
“…Over the next 30 years, in-depth studies were conducted on the effects of agroforestry zones on nitrogen (N) pollution [21,22], phosphorus (P) pollution [23,24] and various other pollutants. 30-99% nitrate (N) and 20-100% phosphorus (P) from runoff and shallow groundwater are retained in coastal agroforestry zones [25], this regards also to production of biomass from there [1,3,5,[26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Agroforestry Zones As Biomass Producermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate change and increasing biomass demand for bioenergy and at the same time expected to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) missions and provide carbon storage in soils and vegetation, are projected to add further pressure on managed economic agroforestry zones [1][2][3][4][5]. The agriculture sector is at the same time expected to reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and provide carbon storage in soils and vegetation, while reducing also other environmental impacts [5][6][7][8]. European Green Deal plan foresee that multiple sustainability and climate neutrality in Eurpean Union (EU) countries will be achieved by 2050 [9].…”
The article summarizes the research on managed process of agroforestry zones by short rotation plantations with tree species Salix spp., Populus spp., Alnus spp. and looks at perspectives in the planning of these zones as biomass producers. Short rotation forestry (SRF) with a combination of species and a rotation time of 15 to 30 years, depending on the species used, is the most suitable way for management of these agroforestry zones. Short rotation coppice is suitable for willows (Salix spp.) and poplars (Populus spp.) as these tree species can be harvested at much shorter intervals (SRC), 1–5 and 4–10 years, facilitating their use in agricultural systems. In Alnus spp.short rotation plantation the life cycle for energy wood production is assumed to be 15-30 years. The black alder plantations in agroforestry zones are used for sawnwood and firewood production, with a rotation span of 20–40 years. Calculated economic agroforestry zone repayment period is about 10-15 years, if costs and prices as in 2021 are used.
“…In addition to ecosystem service benefits, perennial grasses grown as buffers can be harvested to provide a feedstock for bioenergy production [5,7]. Biomass feedstock production using perennial grasses on marginal lands can have significant contributions to the nation's bioenergy goals with minimum adverse effects on existing agricultural land [4,8,9].…”
Growing dedicated bioenergy crops on marginal land can provide beneficial outcomes including biomass production and energy, resource management, and ecosystem services. We investigated the effects of harvest timing (peak standing crop [PEAK] or after killing frost [KF]) and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates (0, 56, and 112 kg N ha−1) on yield, nutrient concentrations, and nutrient removal rates of perennial grasses on a wet marginal land. We evaluated three monocultures, including switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L., SW), Miscanthus x giganteus (MG), prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata Link, PCG), and a polyculture mixture of big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash), and sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula Torr., MIX). Increasing the application of N did correlate with increased biomass, concentration, and subsequent removal of nutrients across almost all treatment combinations. In all grass treatments except MG, PEAK harvesting increased yield and nutrient removal. At PEAK harvest, switchgrass is ideal for optimizing both biomass production and nutrient removal. While our results also suggest short-term plasticity for farmers when selecting harvest timing for optimal nutrient removal, KF harvest is recommended to ensure long-term stand longevity and adequate nutrient removal. If the KF harvest is adopted, MG would be the ideal option for optimizing biomass yield potential. Additionally, we found that the yield of polyculture did not vary much with harvest timing, suggesting better yield stability. Future studies should give consideration for long-term evaluation of polyculture mixtures to assess their biomass yields and nutrient removal capacities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.