2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01781.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Default and Equity Risk Across Countries

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent AbstractWe show that the prospect of a debt renegotiation favorable to shareholders reduces the Örmís equity risk. The equity beta and return volatility are lower in countries where the bankruptcy code favors debt renegotiations and for Örms with more shareholder bargaining power relative to debt holders. These relations weaken as the countryís insolvency procedure favors liquidatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

8
70
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
8
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(see Favara, Schroth and Valta, 2012). While these studies assume that asset risk is given and independent of claimholders' expected recovery in default, we show that the prospect of an imperfect enforcement of debt contracts in default reduces asset risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…(see Favara, Schroth and Valta, 2012). While these studies assume that asset risk is given and independent of claimholders' expected recovery in default, we show that the prospect of an imperfect enforcement of debt contracts in default reduces asset risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Denoting the bargaining power of shareholders in default by η ∈ [0, 1], the Nash bargaining solution implies that shareholders get a fraction ηα of asset value in default. We assume that renegotiations may fail with probability q, as in Davydenko and Strebulaev (2007) and Favara, Schroth, and Valta (2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other papers have also looked at the implications of debt enforcement or creditor rights on asset pricing (Garlappi, Shu, and Yan 2008, Garlappi and Yan 2011, Hackbarth, Haselmann, and Schoenherr 2015and Favara, Schroth, and Valta 2012. While these studies all take the asset side of the firms as given, I show in this paper that debt renegotiation can affect corporate investment, and hence the asset side of the balance sheet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%