1987
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)55264-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Bargaining in a Dynamic Economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the strategic bargaining model for the partition of a pie these proposals have to be subgame perfect. Strategic bargaining in the context of a difference game has already been suggested and analysed (Stefanski and Cichocki, 1986;Houba and de Zeeuw, 1991). However, in these papers it is assumed that the disagreement actions are exogenously prescribed by, for example, the feedback or open-loop Nash equilibrium of the difference game.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As in the strategic bargaining model for the partition of a pie these proposals have to be subgame perfect. Strategic bargaining in the context of a difference game has already been suggested and analysed (Stefanski and Cichocki, 1986;Houba and de Zeeuw, 1991). However, in these papers it is assumed that the disagreement actions are exogenously prescribed by, for example, the feedback or open-loop Nash equilibrium of the difference game.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disagreement control vector of player i, i-1,2, at time t, t E T, is denoted by ud(t) E U;(f). In the alt~rnating offer model (Rubinstein, 1982) and in eatlier attempta to incorporate strategic bargaining into difference gamea (Cichocki andStefanaki, 1986, Houba andde Zeeuw, 1991) the disagreement controle were exogenoualy given. However, in the model of this paper the disagreement controla form an integral part of the subgame perfect equilibria of the bargaining game.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%