Strategic alliances, exploration and exploitation and their impact on innovation and new product development: the effect of knowledge sharing

Abstract

PurposeThis study delves in the controversy about the nature and the sign of the effect of strategic alliances and exploration and exploitation capabilities on innovation and new product development. The paper analyses the effects of knowledge sharing and strategic alliances relationships at the firm level. Specifically, we study the influence of strategic alliances relationships in new product development and the mediating role of exploration and exploitation as dynamic capabilities.Design/methodology/approachThis investigation proposes a theoretical model tested using structural equation modeling (SEM). The multigroup analysis was performed to understand the moderating role of. A questionnaire survey was developed to explore the relations between strategic alliances and innovation and new product development variables. For this study, 387 valid questionnaires were collected from a sample of Portugal SME' firms. A 90-item questionnaire was submitted to employees managers of a large number of Portuguese SMEs, which consists to study the relationships among all the variables.FindingsThe results show that exists a positive direct influence of strategic alliances on innovation and new product development, and mediating impact the exploration and exploitation by the moderating role of knowledge sharing.Research limitations/implicationsThis study has some methodological limitations affecting its potential contributions. A cross-sectional study that captures one image in time and its ability to identify strict causality between variables is limited. Furthermore, the results are based on log collected from a key respondent, rather than broader actual data. The results are restricted to one country, Portugal. Future research should initially target different countries. Such research could then test the generalizability of the results.Practical implicationsTo fill this managerial relevance gap, we propose a process model in which the main antecedents of alliance stability will be examined. We argue that an alliance's evolutionary dynamics depend on these factors and variables that the partners must assess and manage over its developmental stages. In this sense, managers have significant scope to influence the ultimate success of strategic alliances. This study highlights the need to actively manage the cooperation – competition (coopetition) tension with the alliance partner and to apply the knowledge acquired from the partner to create new knowledge to enhance innovative performanceOriginality/valueThis paper contributes to fill the gap between strategic alliances and new product development mediated by exploration and exploitation in the dynamic capabilities view.

Innovation capabilities and the organization of the firm: evidence from Brazil

“…In fact, to prosper and survive, firms must excel at both change and stability, even though tensions emanate from their different knowledge management processes (Tushman and O'Reilly, 1996; O'Reilly and Tushman, 2013; Pérez et al, 2019). However, identifying the right way to do so is not a simple task and has consumed researchers for quite some time (Zang and Li, 2016; Walrave et al , 2017; Kuo et al , 2018; Cui et al , 2019; Ferreira et al , 2021).…”

Platforms' partner networks: the missing link in crowdfunding performance

“…Interacting with diverse network partners can help firms to collect a broader range of information from external sources, providing broader learning that goes beyond existing cognitive horizons and may better "prepare" the company for new business opportunities (Martinez and Aldrich, 2011;Pangarkar and Wu, 2013;Taheri and van Geenhuizen, 2019). New ventures benefit more from knowledge exploration when engage in a diversity of cooperation activities because they spread the risks involved in opportunity recognition and exploitation (Gimenez-Fernandez et al, 2019) and enhance innovation processes (Ferreira et al, 2020;Hagedoorn et al, 2018;Shiri et al, 2015). Especially for small and technological new ventures, partner diversity affects market potential and the firm's financial value (Cisi et al, 2020;Parida et al, 2016;Swaminathan and Moorman, 2009).…”

Psychological Distance Impacts Subgroup Reciprocity in Technological Innovation Networks: The Mediating Role of Divisive Faultlines

“…Different identities, values, and codes of behavior among firms in different subgroups thereby lead to significant variations in innovation status and tensions between subgroups ( Bouncken et al, 2020 ), reducing the efficiency of their coordinated activities ( Khamseh et al, 2017 ). This further disconnects their approaches to innovation activities ( Ferreira et al, 2021 ), and ultimately damages inter-subgroup reciprocity. Based on these assertions, the following hypotheses were proposed:…”