2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1708.08083
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strassen's 2x2 matrix multiplication algorithm: A conceptual perspective

Christian Ikenmeyer,
Vladimir Lysikov

Abstract: The main purpose of this paper is pedagogical. Despite its importance, all proofs of the correctness of Strassen's famous 1969 algorithm to multiply two 2 × 2 matrices with only seven multiplications involve some basis-dependent calculations such as explicitly multiplying specific 2×2 matrices, expanding expressions to cancel terms with opposing signs, or expanding tensors over the standard basis. This makes the proof nontrivial to memorize and many presentations of the proof avoid showing all the details and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, that construction relies on a seemingly magical property of a certain 4 × 4 multiplication table. More recently, Ikenmeyer and Lysikov [IL17] gave a beautiful explanation of Clausen's construction, but ultimately their proof for Strassen's algorithm still relies on the same magical property of the same 4 × 4 multiplication table, and it is not immediately obvious how to generalize to all n. In contrast, our result easily generalizes to all n, and more generally to orbits of any irreducible representation of any finite group.…”
Section: Other Explanations Of Strassen's Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, that construction relies on a seemingly magical property of a certain 4 × 4 multiplication table. More recently, Ikenmeyer and Lysikov [IL17] gave a beautiful explanation of Clausen's construction, but ultimately their proof for Strassen's algorithm still relies on the same magical property of the same 4 × 4 multiplication table, and it is not immediately obvious how to generalize to all n. In contrast, our result easily generalizes to all n, and more generally to orbits of any irreducible representation of any finite group.…”
Section: Other Explanations Of Strassen's Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 85%