2002
DOI: 10.1159/000048450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strangulation of the Penis by a Self-Circumcision Device

Abstract: Penile strangulation caused by wearing metallic or non-metallic objects is unusual but potentially serious. We report the case of a 33-year-old man who presented with penile strangulation after applying a self-circumcision device. The device was removed, and after conservative treatment conventional circumcision was performed. It is stressed that circumcision should be performed by urologists or medically trained personnel.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first case of the penile strangulation following use of a self-circumcision device was documented in 2002. 8 Fortunately, in our case, the patient went through the procedure without loss of penile length or damage to the glans penis or the urethra. A case has been reported that required use of the scrotal skin flaps to cover the penile skin defect after debridement of the necrotic tissue following use of a medically unapproved selfcircumcision device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first case of the penile strangulation following use of a self-circumcision device was documented in 2002. 8 Fortunately, in our case, the patient went through the procedure without loss of penile length or damage to the glans penis or the urethra. A case has been reported that required use of the scrotal skin flaps to cover the penile skin defect after debridement of the necrotic tissue following use of a medically unapproved selfcircumcision device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…4 Penile strangulating devices are usually metallic 5,6 or non-metallic rings, nuts, bushes and sprockets, which have been used for improving sexual performance or for self-circumcision. [6][7][8] Metallic objects cause less severe injury than non-metallic thin objects, although metallic objects are more difficult to remove. 9 Bhat et al 9 have suggested a hammer and chisel method for removal of these objects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous foreign objects for such purposes have been described, such as rings, rubber bands, metallic screws, self-circumcision devices, hair, thread and even bottles [3][4][5] . In general, metallic objects produce less severe lesions than non-metallic ones, since the latter are generally thinner and sharper [6] . …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Reports on selfcircumcision are scarce in literature. [1,[3][4][5][6][7] Adult males comprised most of the cases, and they were reported to use medically unapproved plastic or metallic device for the procedure. [1,3,6] Some reported complications of self-circumcision are bleeding, infection, urethral damage, penile strangulation, skin necrosis, laceration and necrotizing fasciitis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,[3][4][5][6][7] Adult males comprised most of the cases, and they were reported to use medically unapproved plastic or metallic device for the procedure. [1,3,6] Some reported complications of self-circumcision are bleeding, infection, urethral damage, penile strangulation, skin necrosis, laceration and necrotizing fasciitis. [1,3,5,7] Reasons for carrying out the procedure on one's own are diverse including poor economic status, fear of the procedure, depression, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%