2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03188-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Stranger things” in the gut: uncommon items in gastrointestinal specimens

Abstract: Organic (such as parasites or vegetable remnants) and inorganic substances may be encountered during routine pathology diagnostic work up of endoscopic gastrointestinal biopsy samples and major resections, causing possible diagnostic conundrums for the young and not so young pathologists. The main aim of this review is the description of the most frequent oddities one can encounter as foreign bodies, in gastrointestinal pathology, on the basis of the current literature and personal experience. The types of enc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
6

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
6
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The recognition of the parasite in the duodenal lumen of our patient occurred only after a second look, suggesting that diagnosis might be difficult for the pathologist 34. In line with this observation, 18% of false negatives were reported in a retrospective histological analysis of duodenal samples from 567 cases of giardiasis presenting with celiac-like duodenal histology 35.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recognition of the parasite in the duodenal lumen of our patient occurred only after a second look, suggesting that diagnosis might be difficult for the pathologist 34. In line with this observation, 18% of false negatives were reported in a retrospective histological analysis of duodenal samples from 567 cases of giardiasis presenting with celiac-like duodenal histology 35.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…33 The recognition of the parasite in the duodenal lumen of our patient occurred only after a second look, suggesting that diagnosis might be difficult for the pathologist. 34 In line with this observation, 18% of false negatives were reported in a retrospective histological analysis of duodenal samples from 567 cases of giardiasis presenting with celiac-like duodenal histology. 35 In this context, the microscopic analysis of duodenal aspirate might have represented another diagnostic option, although not superior to the analysis of duodenal biopsies when available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The most common findings of schistosomiasis on endoscopy include inflammatory pseudopolyps, sessile, pedunculated or cauliflower-like, ranging in size from 1 to even above ≥ 20 mm. The endoscopic presentation of the intestinal wall may be challenging to diagnose and in non-endemic regions may suggest ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, or ischaemic colitis [21,22]. According to more casuistic situations, schistosomiasis mimicking neuroendocrine tumours was reported [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G . lamblia est trouvé le plus souvent dans le duodénum bien que des localisations iléale, gastrique ou colique aient également été rapportées [27] .…”
Section: Infections Parasitaires à Ne Pas Manquer Dans Le Tube Digestifunclassified