2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.108.222001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strangeness Contribution to the Proton Spin from Lattice QCD

Abstract: We compute the strangeness and light-quark contributions Delta s, Delta u and Delta d to the proton spin in nf=2 lattice QCD at a pion mass of about 285 MeV and at a lattice spacing a approx 0.073 fm, using the non-perturbatively improved Sheikholeslami-Wohlert Wilson action. We carry out the renormalization of these matrix elements which involves mixing between contributions from different quark flavours. Our main result is the small negative value MSbar scheme value Delta s = -0.020(10)(4), at a scale mu = 7… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare this with lattice QCD results from other OðaÞ-improved actions from Ref. [41] (the filled magenta triangle) by the QCDSF Collaboration [42] (the light blue cross), and by the CSSM/ QCDSF Collaboration [43] (the yellow filled right triangle). We also show results using a hybrid action from the PNDME Collaboration [44] (the open blue triangles).…”
Section: -Ptmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We compare this with lattice QCD results from other OðaÞ-improved actions from Ref. [41] (the filled magenta triangle) by the QCDSF Collaboration [42] (the light blue cross), and by the CSSM/ QCDSF Collaboration [43] (the yellow filled right triangle). We also show results using a hybrid action from the PNDME Collaboration [44] (the open blue triangles).…”
Section: -Ptmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Because of the indirect nature of this estimate, the shift (25) will not be applied to the (chirally extrapolated) central value for Ás obtained in this work, but will be treated as a systematic uncertainty. It should be remarked that the considerations for the clover case [11] referred to above pertain to lattices with a substantially finer spacing than used here (0.073 vs 0.124 fm). However, adjusting for this is expected to modify (25) merely by a few percent and thus is negligible in the present context.…”
Section: B Axial Vector Matrix Elementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For these quantities, we use results from a lattice QCD computation presented in [47], namely ∆ u = 0.787 ± 0.158, ∆ d = −0.319 ± 0.066, ∆ s = −0.02 ± 0.011 [47]. As above, we fix all quantities to their central values.…”
Section: Jhep09(2014)081mentioning
confidence: 99%