2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain-tunable electronic and optical properties of Zr2CO2 MXene and MoSe2 van der Waals heterojunction: A first principles calculation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Herein, according to the symmetry of MoSe 2 and C 3 N monolayers, ten different positions of 1 l MoSe 2 on top of C 3 N were considered (such as one of the Mo atoms directly above one of the C or N atoms in figures 2(a) and (b) [41]. The interlayer distance (d) between MoSe 2 and C 3 N monolayer in the heterojunctions is in the range from 3.34 to 3.37Å, which agrees well with other heterojunctions [42][43][44]. Each heterojunction with the different configurations shown in figure 2 has an indirect band gap with the conduction band minimum (CBM) at the M point and corresponding binding energies are listed in table 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Herein, according to the symmetry of MoSe 2 and C 3 N monolayers, ten different positions of 1 l MoSe 2 on top of C 3 N were considered (such as one of the Mo atoms directly above one of the C or N atoms in figures 2(a) and (b) [41]. The interlayer distance (d) between MoSe 2 and C 3 N monolayer in the heterojunctions is in the range from 3.34 to 3.37Å, which agrees well with other heterojunctions [42][43][44]. Each heterojunction with the different configurations shown in figure 2 has an indirect band gap with the conduction band minimum (CBM) at the M point and corresponding binding energies are listed in table 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…We obtained that the lattice constant of MoSe 2 is a = b = 3.32 Å and that of Bi 2 Se 3 is a = b = 4.18 Å, which is very close to the previous calculation value. [ 55,58 ] Due to the lattice mismatch of their primitive cells up to 23%, to ensure the accuracy of the calculation results, we build the7×7× R 19.1° MoSe 2 supercell and 2 × 2 × 1 Bi 2 Se 3 supercell. The lattice mismatch is reduced to 4.89%, which is acceptable in calculations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have used DFT computing to construct various vdWHs, such as BiVO 4 /WO 3 , 121 InSe/XS 2 (X = Mo, W), 122 In 2 Se 3 /MoS 2 /In 2 Se 3 , 123 BiOI/BiOX (X = F, Cl, Br), 124 GeC/GaN, 125 CdTe/MoS 2 , 126 MoTe 2 /Mo 1− x W x Se 2 , 127 MoSe 2 /HfS 2 , 128 GeC-MSSe (M = Mo, W). 129 Different methods, such as the Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (BFGS) method, 130 DFT-D2 corrections of Grimme, 131 and norm-conserving pseudopotential 132 are used to optimize and correct the model. The calculated lattice parameters, electronic band structure, absorption coefficient ( α ), dielectric function ε( ω ), refractive index ( n ), energy loss function, work function and other data are used to study their crystal structure, electronic structure, and optical properties.…”
Section: The Design Of Vdwhsmentioning
confidence: 99%