Fracture of Concrete and Rock 1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3578-1_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain-Softening Simulations of Mixed-Mode Concrete Fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A linear model gives much more accurate predictions. This agrees with the findings of both Chandra [37] and Rots [38] who found in studies on concrete that if the damage stems from processes such as microcracking, as is the case with ceramics, rather than plasticity, as with metals, a linear or bilinear cohesive zone law is better suited to predicting damage than a Dugdale model. PCBN B is a much less tough material than PCBN A and has a smaller critical distance, limited by the CBN grain size.…”
Section: Effect Of Czm Shapesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A linear model gives much more accurate predictions. This agrees with the findings of both Chandra [37] and Rots [38] who found in studies on concrete that if the damage stems from processes such as microcracking, as is the case with ceramics, rather than plasticity, as with metals, a linear or bilinear cohesive zone law is better suited to predicting damage than a Dugdale model. PCBN B is a much less tough material than PCBN A and has a smaller critical distance, limited by the CBN grain size.…”
Section: Effect Of Czm Shapesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The effect of CZM shape has been reported to have an influence on the predicted failure of brittle materials as discussed by Chandra [37], Rots [38]. It can be seen in Figure 12 that the shape of the CZM model has no effect on the failure load for the sharp initial notch with NRR = 10 µm.…”
Section: Effect Of Czm Shapementioning
confidence: 88%
“…For more brittle decohesion relations, i.e. when the decohesion law stems from micro-cracking as in concrete or ceramics, the shape of the stress-separation relation plays a much larger role and is sometimes even more important than the value of the tensile strength f t [23]. When fracture takes place along well-defined interfaces as, for example, in a lamellar solid [24], the placement of cohesive surfaces is clear.…”
Section: Cohesive-surface Modelsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For more brittle decohesion relations, as shown for instance in the right part of Figure 2 (i.e. when the decohesion law stems from micro-cracking as in concrete or ceramics), the shape of the stress-separation relation plays a much bigger role and is sometimes even more important than the value of the tensile strength f t [9,10]. …”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%