2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13726-015-0375-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain rate sensitivity of toughened epoxy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4(a)). In general, the lower compressive strength of microballoons (41 MPa) in comparison to neat epoxy (138 MPa) 19 is expected to result in a reduction of compressive strength, which is very well evidenced from our studies (Fig. 4(b)).…”
Section: Mechanical Properties 341 Quasi-static Testingsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4(a)). In general, the lower compressive strength of microballoons (41 MPa) in comparison to neat epoxy (138 MPa) 19 is expected to result in a reduction of compressive strength, which is very well evidenced from our studies (Fig. 4(b)).…”
Section: Mechanical Properties 341 Quasi-static Testingsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The effect of increasing strain rates on the compressive behaviour of syntactic foam was quantified using Split Hopkinson Pressure bar setup, which consists of input and output bar sandwiching a short specimen 26,27 . The details of the setup are presented in the published paper 19 . Pressurised air propels a projectile, which strikes at one end of the input bar.…”
Section: High Strain-rate Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compressive strength, at different filler weight contents and strain rates of PP/S, [112] PP/ZnO, [57] E/S, [113] E/ GO, [114] E/CNT, [115] PE/GNP, [116] PE/C, [117] E/PS, [118] and PE/SD. [119] C, clay; E, epoxy; GO, graphene oxide; GNP, graphene nanoplatelets; PE, polyethylene; PP, polypropylene; PS, polystyrene microspheres; S, silica; SD, sawdust; ZnO, zinc oxide F I G U R E 1 4 Compressive modulus (measured at a strain rate of 10 3 s À1 ), at different filler weight content of PP/S, [112] PP/ ZnO, [57] E/GO, [114] PE/C, [117] E/PS, [118] and PE/SD, [119] and E/GNP.…”
Section: Dynamic Mechanical Performance Of Composites 41 | Polymers Filled With Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compressive strength, at different filler weight contents and strain rates of PP/S, [112] PP/ZnO, [57] E/S, [113] E/ GO, [114] E/CNT, [115] PE/GNP, [116] PE/C, [117] E/PS, [118] and PE/SD. [119] C, clay; E, epoxy; GO, graphene oxide; GNP, graphene nanoplatelets; PE, polyethylene; PP, polypropylene; PS, polystyrene microspheres; S, silica; SD, sawdust; ZnO, zinc oxide F I G U R E 1 4 Compressive modulus (measured at a strain rate of 10 3 s À1 ), at different filler weight content of PP/S, [112] PP/ ZnO, [57] E/GO, [114] PE/C, [117] E/PS, [118] and PE/SD, [119] and E/GNP. [120] C, clay; E, epoxy; GO, graphene oxide; GNP, graphene nanoplatelets; PE, polyethylene; PP, polypropylene; PS, polystyrene microspheres; S, silica; SD, sawdust; ZnO, zinc oxide the strength of the particle-matrix interfacial bonding strength is more important than the quality of the particle dispersion, in terms of an enhancement in mechanical properties.…”
Section: Dynamic Mechanical Performance Of Composites 41 | Polymers Filled With Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High strain rate loading and silica particles restrict the molecular mobility of the epoxy matrix and result in a stiffer dynamic response [13][14][15][16][17][18]. The weight fraction, size, and distribution of silica particles affect the epoxy dynamic stiffness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%