1996
DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(95)10038-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain rate sensitivity of hot deformed Al and AlMgSi alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the values are lower than 0.045, and agree with the values calculated in Ref. [18] for the same deformation and dynamic recovery situation. No superplastic flow occurs due to the impossibility of grain sliding, and this is also confirmed by the low values of m and the premature fracture of the sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the values are lower than 0.045, and agree with the values calculated in Ref. [18] for the same deformation and dynamic recovery situation. No superplastic flow occurs due to the impossibility of grain sliding, and this is also confirmed by the low values of m and the premature fracture of the sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The strain rate sensitivity m for aluminium at temperatures in the range 300-500°C, where dynamic recovery takes place, was reported for coarse grains to be around 0.17-0.25 [14] and 0.005-0.14 [18] for 0.5 and 0.05 of true strain, respectively. Fine-grained structures promote superplastic flow by grain boundary sliding [19] in fully recovered grains yielding a value of m of around 0.4 [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strain-rate sensitivity and strain-hardening rate are observed to be associated with a number of parameters such as the specimen geometry (Ref 2-4), grain size (Ref 4-7), strain level (Ref [8][9][10][11][12][13], and strain rate (Ref [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Some inconsistent results regarding the effect of these parameters have been reported in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] For hot torsion tests performed on AA6061, m % 0:05 at 473 K (200°C) and m % 0:08 at 573 K (300°C) were reported by Semiatin et al [14] From tensile tests, Abedrabbo et al [15] reported m = 0.045 at 477 K (204°C) and m = 0.080 at 533 K (260°C) for AA3003-H111. From the data of Reference 16, we calculated m = 0.115 for AA3103 and m = 0.071 for pure aluminum at 623 K (350°C).…”
Section: B Tensile Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%