SAE Technical Paper Series 1992
DOI: 10.4271/920245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain Rate Sensitivity of Automotive Steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gilat and Wu (1997) studied the response of a hot-rolled 1020 steel at the strain rates 5×10 -4 /sec, 2/sec and 1000/sec with various temperatures ranged from 25 o C to 600 o C. Liang (1999, 2000) studied the dynamic behaviors of three BCC metals of tantalum, tantalum alloy and AerMet 100 steel over a range of strain rates from 10 -6 /sec to 10 4 /sec and temperatures from 77 o F to 600 o F. Netmat-Nasser andGuo (2001, 2003) performed Hopkinson bar tests with AL-6XN stainless steel, DH-36 structural steel for ships and Nitronic-50 stainless steel over a wide range of temperatures from 77K to 1000K and they used to address the dynamic and the thermal softening behavior of these steels at high strain rate deformation. Lee and Liu (2006) conducted a compressive type Hopkinson bar test in order to compare the dynamic behavior of three steels with different levels of carbon content under strain rates ranging from 1.1×10 3 /sec to 5.5×10 3 /sec and temperatures ranging from 25 o C to 600 o C. Some studies on the dynamic behavior of the structural steel sheets for an auto-body at high strain rates above 1000/sec are conducted at room temperature (Shi and Meuleman, 1992;Miura et al, 1996;Mahadevan et al, 1998;. Although each investigation focused on a different aspect of testing methods or material responses, common characteristics observed were effects of strain rates and temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gilat and Wu (1997) studied the response of a hot-rolled 1020 steel at the strain rates 5×10 -4 /sec, 2/sec and 1000/sec with various temperatures ranged from 25 o C to 600 o C. Liang (1999, 2000) studied the dynamic behaviors of three BCC metals of tantalum, tantalum alloy and AerMet 100 steel over a range of strain rates from 10 -6 /sec to 10 4 /sec and temperatures from 77 o F to 600 o F. Netmat-Nasser andGuo (2001, 2003) performed Hopkinson bar tests with AL-6XN stainless steel, DH-36 structural steel for ships and Nitronic-50 stainless steel over a wide range of temperatures from 77K to 1000K and they used to address the dynamic and the thermal softening behavior of these steels at high strain rate deformation. Lee and Liu (2006) conducted a compressive type Hopkinson bar test in order to compare the dynamic behavior of three steels with different levels of carbon content under strain rates ranging from 1.1×10 3 /sec to 5.5×10 3 /sec and temperatures ranging from 25 o C to 600 o C. Some studies on the dynamic behavior of the structural steel sheets for an auto-body at high strain rates above 1000/sec are conducted at room temperature (Shi and Meuleman, 1992;Miura et al, 1996;Mahadevan et al, 1998;. Although each investigation focused on a different aspect of testing methods or material responses, common characteristics observed were effects of strain rates and temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tests only specify one combination of roll and pitch angles, which are not necessarily the worst case loading for a given roof structure . The high strength steel commonly used in vehicle greenhouse design has been found to have rate sensitive properties, with an estimated 8-20% increase in yield strength for different grades of steel for a two order of magnitude increase of strain rate (Shi, 1992;Yan, 2003). The loading rate (0.0127 m/s) is at least two orders of magnitude below what is observed in dynamic roof-to-ground impacts (~1.5 m/s) (Friedman, 2001), which suggests that a quasi-static test may not capture the loading rate sensitivity of modern vehicle structures.…”
Section: Fmvss 216 Criticismmentioning
confidence: 99%