2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1592310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain profiling of HfO2/Si(001) interface with high-resolution Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy

Abstract: Strain depth profiles in HfO2 (3 nm)/Si(001) prepared by atomic-layer chemical vapor deposition have been measured using high-resolution Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy in combination with a channeling technique. It is found that the Si lattice is compressed in the vertical direction around the interface. The observed maximum strain is about 1% at the interface and the strained region extends down to ∼3 nm from the interface.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Because of its high stability against thermal treatment, HfO 2 and its silicate are considered to be promising materials for next-generation devices. [6][7][8][9][10] Therefore, HfO 2 CVD technologies have been developed. The properties of some Hf-containing molecules (potential Hf precursors) are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Because of its high stability against thermal treatment, HfO 2 and its silicate are considered to be promising materials for next-generation devices. [6][7][8][9][10] Therefore, HfO 2 CVD technologies have been developed. The properties of some Hf-containing molecules (potential Hf precursors) are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been used to characterize the strain in nitride semiconductors [17][18][19] and can reach nm depth resolution if applying high resolution RBS. 20 Figure 3(a) shows the random and [001]-aligned RBS spectra of the sample. The arrows labeled Ga and As indicate the energies of He ions backscattered from Ga and As atoms, respectively, at the surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XRR is generally less sensitive to the interface roughness σ i compared with the surface roughness σ s . AFM is widely used to measure the surface structures, and HRBS is widely used to measure the interface structures [42]. Although HRBS cannot directly measure the interface roughness it can measure the film thickness and its dispersion σ t .…”
Section: Surface and Interface Roughness Estimations By X-ray Reflectmentioning
confidence: 99%