2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2003.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain localization due to crack–microcrack interactions: X-FEM for a multifield approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patzák and Jirásek [128] introduced macrocracks in the zones of highly localized damage developing in the simulation with smeared damage and plasticity models. Mariano and Stazi [129] analyzed the interaction between a macrocrack and a population of microcracks by adapting the extended finite element method to a multifield model of microcracked bodies.…”
Section: Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patzák and Jirásek [128] introduced macrocracks in the zones of highly localized damage developing in the simulation with smeared damage and plasticity models. Mariano and Stazi [129] analyzed the interaction between a macrocrack and a population of microcracks by adapting the extended finite element method to a multifield model of microcracked bodies.…”
Section: Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second example deals with the interactions of a macrocrack with the considered microcracked continuum. The problem was firstly tackled in [10], according to a variation of the well-known displacementbased X-FEM procedure [11]. The same example is also used to show some results on the convergence features of the proposed mixed schemes.…”
Section: Numerical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constitutive relationships described in Section 1.2. allow to link their gradients to the relevant macro and micro stress fields. The numerical investigations discussed in [9] and [10] refer to displacement-based finite element methods that adopt post-processing techniques to derive the stress fields. The present paper proposes instead ad hoc mixed formulations that interpolate independently stresses and displacements.…”
Section: Introductory Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, by comparing the additive decomposition of F tot with the multiplicative one, namely F (m) F, we realize that F (m) = I+∇d (X) F −1 = I + gradd a . The direct (perhaps naive) description of the kinematics of microcracked bodies just sketched here follows [21], [26]; however, it can be obtained by using the procedure involving the limit of bodies described in [12], [13].…”
Section: Something More About Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes the material substructure is a perfectly identifiable Lagrangian system as in the case of nematic liquid crystals [14], [20], [11] (in which the nematic molecules can be separated from the melt), sometimes it does not as in granular gases [6] and microcracked bodies [26]. In granular gases, e.g., a material element collects a family of sparse granules with peculiar velocities, so that the order parameter may be an element of a suitable Grassmanian of the tangent bundle of some finite-dimensional manifold, while for microcracked bodies each microcrack can be considered either as a sharp planar defect not interpenetrated by interatomic bonds or as an elliptic void, so it does not exist per se and has a volatile substance determined just by the surrounding matter.…”
Section: Morphology Of Complex Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%