The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1984
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(84)90063-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain localisation in biaxially stretched sheets containing compact defects—II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first breakthrough to predict biaxial limit strains in sheet metals comes from Marciniak and Kuczynski [10] who postulate the existence of an initial imperfection on the sheet surface (known as the M-K groove) that has become the cornerstone of many subsequent theories in the prediction of limit strain based on a macroscopic yield criteria with various modifications [11,12] or a crystallographic yield locus [13] obtained from the crystallite orientation distribution function (CODF). The value of the groove depth (i.e., the size of the thickness defect) that must be chosen in the M-K model to match the experimental limit strain is so large that it is unlikely to exist [14,15].…”
Section: The M-k Puzzlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first breakthrough to predict biaxial limit strains in sheet metals comes from Marciniak and Kuczynski [10] who postulate the existence of an initial imperfection on the sheet surface (known as the M-K groove) that has become the cornerstone of many subsequent theories in the prediction of limit strain based on a macroscopic yield criteria with various modifications [11,12] or a crystallographic yield locus [13] obtained from the crystallite orientation distribution function (CODF). The value of the groove depth (i.e., the size of the thickness defect) that must be chosen in the M-K model to match the experimental limit strain is so large that it is unlikely to exist [14,15].…”
Section: The M-k Puzzlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of initial thickness heterogeneity, co-efficient of anisotropy (R), strain hardening exponent (n), initial strain hardening (" 0 ), and de-cohesion strain (" f ) on the forming limit was studied by Marciniak and Kuczynski, 39 while the influence of strain rate sensitivity (m), normal anisotropy, and fracture strain on FLC was analyzed by Marciniak et al 40 Bate and Wilson studied the influence of interacting axi-symmetric defects in work-hardening sheet material on the strain localization during forming using finite element analysis. 41 The effect of shape and distribution of defects on the FLCs was predicted. It was pointed out that the defect severity required in the case of long infinite groove and finite groove was very different.…”
Section: Application Of Computations In Materials Formingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria discussed above have been coupled to Finite Element Analyses (FEA) in order to evaluate numerically the formability of metals (Davis, 1963;Takuda et al, 1997;Takuda et al, 1999;Parmar and Mellor, 1978;Bate and Wilson, 1984). The damage at each point of the material can be calculated along the full processing path, and one can follow the regions where critical levels of damage are reached, according to the various criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%