Abstract:This paper presents an alternative approach to formulating a rational bar-elastic substrate model with inclusion of small-scale and surface-energy effects. The thermodynamics-based strain gradient model is utilized to account for the small-scale effect (nonlocality) of the bar-bulk material while the Gurtin–Murdoch surface theory is adopted to capture the surface-energy effect. To consider the bar-surrounding substrate interactive mechanism, the Winkler foundation model is called for. The governing differentia… Show more
“…The results given in Table 7 and Table 8 indicate an increase of about 8.0, 9.6, and 4.8% in GM/SF, GM/PF, and GM/BF, respectively. Theoretically, the mechanical properties of composite materials such as fiber-reinforced cementitious materials are known to be sensitive to the loading rate, meaning that they increase as the rate of loading increases [ 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ]. This is also the case for the single-pullout test.…”
In this study, the influence of graphene oxide nanoparticles on the bond-slip behavior of fiber and fly-ash-based geopolymer paste was examined. Geopolymer paste incorporating a graphene oxide nanoparticle solution was cast in half briquetted specimens and embedded with a fiber. Three types of fiber were used: steel, polypropylene, and basalt. The pullout test was performed at two distinct speeds: 1 mm/s and 3 mm/s. The results showed that the addition of graphene oxide increased the compressive strength of the geopolymer by about 7%. The bond-slip responses of fibers embedded in the geopolymer mixed with graphene oxide exhibited higher peak stress and toughness compared to those embedded in a normal geopolymer. Each fiber type also showed a different mode of failure. Both steel and polypropylene fibers showed full bond-slip responses due to their high ductility. Basalt fiber, on the other hand, because of its brittleness, failed by fiber fracture mode and showed no slip in pullout responses. Both bond strength and toughness were found to be rate-sensitive. The sensitivity was higher in the graphene oxide/geopolymer than in the conventional geopolymer.
“…The results given in Table 7 and Table 8 indicate an increase of about 8.0, 9.6, and 4.8% in GM/SF, GM/PF, and GM/BF, respectively. Theoretically, the mechanical properties of composite materials such as fiber-reinforced cementitious materials are known to be sensitive to the loading rate, meaning that they increase as the rate of loading increases [ 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ]. This is also the case for the single-pullout test.…”
In this study, the influence of graphene oxide nanoparticles on the bond-slip behavior of fiber and fly-ash-based geopolymer paste was examined. Geopolymer paste incorporating a graphene oxide nanoparticle solution was cast in half briquetted specimens and embedded with a fiber. Three types of fiber were used: steel, polypropylene, and basalt. The pullout test was performed at two distinct speeds: 1 mm/s and 3 mm/s. The results showed that the addition of graphene oxide increased the compressive strength of the geopolymer by about 7%. The bond-slip responses of fibers embedded in the geopolymer mixed with graphene oxide exhibited higher peak stress and toughness compared to those embedded in a normal geopolymer. Each fiber type also showed a different mode of failure. Both steel and polypropylene fibers showed full bond-slip responses due to their high ductility. Basalt fiber, on the other hand, because of its brittleness, failed by fiber fracture mode and showed no slip in pullout responses. Both bond strength and toughness were found to be rate-sensitive. The sensitivity was higher in the graphene oxide/geopolymer than in the conventional geopolymer.
“…For example, Limkatanyu et al [ 50 , 51 ] developed the bar–substrate medium model based on the nonlocal elasticity theory of Eringen [ 26 , 27 ] to characterize axial responses of nanowire-substrate medium systems. Sae-Long et al [ 52 ] and Limkatanyu et al [ 53 ] unified the thermodynamic-based strain-gradient model of Barretta and Marotti de Sciarra [ 54 ] and the surface elasticity model of Gurtin and Murdoch [ 47 , 48 ] to develop a “ paradox-free ” nanobar-elastic substrate medium model. Sae-Long et al [ 55 ] combined the four-order strain-gradient model of Narendar and Gopalakrishnan [ 56 ] with the surface elasticity model of Gurtin and Murdoch [ 47 , 48 ] to formulate the sixth-order bar-elastic substrate medium model containing one material length-scale parameter.…”
This paper proposes a novel nanobar–substrate medium model for static and free vibration analyses of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) systems embedded in the elastic substrate medium. The modified strain-gradient elasticity theory is utilized to account for the material small-scale effect, while the Gurtin–Murdoch surface theory is employed to represent the surface energy effect. The Winkler foundation model is assigned to consider the interactive mechanism between the nanobar and its surrounding substrate medium. Hamilton’s principle is used to consistently derive the system governing equation, initial conditions, and classical as well as non-classical boundary conditions. Two numerical simulations are employed to demonstrate the essence of the material small-scale effect, the surface energy effect, and the surrounding substrate medium on static and free vibration responses of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT)–substrate medium systems. The simulation results show that the material small-scale effect, the surface energy effect, and the interaction between the substrate and the structure led to a system-stiffness enhancement both in static and free vibration analyses.
“…The new model of a nanowire embedded into an elastic substrate was proposed in [1]. Here surface energy was taken into account as in the Gurtin-Murdoch surface elasticity as well as a nonlocality according to the strain gradient approach.…”
Recent advances in technologies of design, manufacturing and further studies of new materials and structures result in an essential extension of classic models of continuum and structural mechanics [...]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.