2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.64.085305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain engineering of self-organized InAs quantum dots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we attribute the former to the dots in the upper layer ͑ground and first excited state transitions in one population of dots in that layer observed due to the state filling effect͒ and the latter to the lower layer of dots, i.e., ground and first excited state transitions again. Such an InGaAs capinduced redshift has been already observed previously in similar structures, 21,22 and the details of its origin will not be discussed here. However, we would like to focus on the properties of the WL QW related part of the spectra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we attribute the former to the dots in the upper layer ͑ground and first excited state transitions in one population of dots in that layer observed due to the state filling effect͒ and the latter to the lower layer of dots, i.e., ground and first excited state transitions again. Such an InGaAs capinduced redshift has been already observed previously in similar structures, 21,22 and the details of its origin will not be discussed here. However, we would like to focus on the properties of the WL QW related part of the spectra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The inclusion of the tunneling does not cause any significant changes besides the appearance of some additional transitions with low oscillator strength ͑occurring between the electrons localized mostly in one QW and holes in the other͒, which are not manifested in the spectra or are just superimposed with one of the strong transitions and could not be resolved within the inhomogeneous line broadening ͑which is of the order of 10-15 meV͒. The energy of the ground state heavy hole transition of the upper layer calculated for the nominal parameters ͑23.6% of the In content in cap͒ is redshifted in comparison with the experimental value ͑by approximately 15 meV͒, which could be a signature of the cap layer decomposition ͑and the overestimation of the effective In content in the cap layer͒; i.e., some of the In atoms of the cap layer join the dots during the cap deposition 21,30,31 ͑a process which is typically reflected in the increase in the dots height or In content and will be a subject of an independent paper͒. In other words, one would need to decrease the In content of the cap to get an agreement with the experimental value of the ground state transitions.…”
Section: -5mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sample A consists of a single QD layer, samples B and C contain small InAs seed QDs and either a single active layer of InAs QDs, separated by a 36 ML thick GaAs spacer from the seed QDs, or a five-fold stack of InAs QDs with 45 ML thick GaAs spacers between all layers. Sample D contains a three-fold stack of InAs QD layers, each overgrown by an In 0.13 Ga 0.87 As quantum well and a 110 ML thick GaAs spacer [12]. Sample E was prepared using metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy and has a single In 0.2 Ga 0.8 As QD layer in GaAs matrix [43].…”
Section: Phonon Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%