2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain distribution in an elastic substrate vibrated in a bioreactor for vocal fold tissue engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the turbulent media flow and the inability to accommodate multiple samples limit the usage of Wolchok bioreactor in tissue engineering applications. Limitations of the Hitchcock bioreactor, on the other hand, include non-uniform strain distribution along the porous substrate,[212] the need for a large number of connectors and bars to transmit forces and the possibility of individual components to resonate at various frequencies. Finally, because the Tong bioreactor relies on the anchored silicone elastomer to transmit the oscillatory air pressure to the cellular constructs, the vibration is acoustic rather than aerodynamic, the vibration amplitude is small, and the collision forces are absent.…”
Section: Bioreactor Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the turbulent media flow and the inability to accommodate multiple samples limit the usage of Wolchok bioreactor in tissue engineering applications. Limitations of the Hitchcock bioreactor, on the other hand, include non-uniform strain distribution along the porous substrate,[212] the need for a large number of connectors and bars to transmit forces and the possibility of individual components to resonate at various frequencies. Finally, because the Tong bioreactor relies on the anchored silicone elastomer to transmit the oscillatory air pressure to the cellular constructs, the vibration is acoustic rather than aerodynamic, the vibration amplitude is small, and the collision forces are absent.…”
Section: Bioreactor Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data demonstrate maximum accelerations of 9.2-334 m/s 2 at 100-250 Hz by using different recoil materials with the TRB-multiwell system. These accelerations are much lower than predicted vocal fold accelerations using three-mass computer simulation or stroboscopy data (1000-4000 m/s 2 at 100-400 Hz) [20,21] but they are the highest values generated by any bioreactor to date [7,8,10,[22][23][24][25][26]. Stiff recoil materials provide accelerations in the order of 300 m/s 2 above 100 Hz and more compliant materials provide 100 m/s 2 at 28-100 Hz vibrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It was used in the present study, because TFX had similar properties to vocal fold tissues and was well characterized as biocompatible. TFX has been used for synthetic vascular grafts, in vitro tissue engineering studies ͑Klemuk et al, 2001;Mulder et al, 1998;Titze et al, 2005;Titze et al, 2004a;Vara et al, 2005;Webb et al, 2003͒, and …”
Section: A Uniform Cell Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Force application to tissues in a bioreactor is quite common, but quantifying vibrational stresses has been attempted in very few bioreactors ͑Bacabac et Tanaka et al, 2003;Titze et al, 2004b;Titze et al, 2005;Titze et al, 2004a͒. Bacabac and The rheometer bioreactor used in the present investigation is capable of delivering vibrational shear strains observed during vocal fold movement and directly measuring viscoelastic properties.…”
Section: Vibrational Stresses Quantifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%