2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain differences of dopamine receptor levels and dopamine related behaviors in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
7
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, the difference in the binding potential between these strains could be owing to the difference in specifi c binding (striatal minus cerebellar radioactivity) between the strains. This fi nding is in part supported by autographic studies demonstrating that Wistar rats exhibited higher D 2 receptor levels than SD rats in the dorsolateral part of the caudate-putamen [34]. On the other hand, higher binding potential in adult Wistar rats than in senescent F344 rats was observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…4, the difference in the binding potential between these strains could be owing to the difference in specifi c binding (striatal minus cerebellar radioactivity) between the strains. This fi nding is in part supported by autographic studies demonstrating that Wistar rats exhibited higher D 2 receptor levels than SD rats in the dorsolateral part of the caudate-putamen [34]. On the other hand, higher binding potential in adult Wistar rats than in senescent F344 rats was observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…It is suggested that buprenorphine interacts with the central dopaminergic systems, thereby depressing the central nervous system (Cowan et al 1977b, Bartoletti et al 1999. Rat strain differences in dopamine (DA) receptor levels and resulting differences in behaviour have been described (Zamudio et al 2005). In addition, Baumann et al (2000) found that opiate modulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) and mesolimbic DA function can be straindependent as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 In addition, immobility responses are keen behavioral tests that show a general idea of the status of the dopaminergic system since the prepuberal age, because immobility responses are modulated by structures such as the basal nuclei and nucleus accumbens. 22,31 The open-fi eld test in an unknown environment is another test to evaluate emotion in rats. We found that the nVH lesion with lidocaine causes an increase of the distance traveled because reset time decreased and both ambulatory and nonambulatory times are enhanced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When animal stopped moving, the time of immobility was recorded until the animal made escape-like movements directed at the experimenter's hand or until 180s had elapsed. 22 Open-fi eld test in an unknown environment (P35 and P58)…”
Section: Dorsal Immobility (P34 and P57)mentioning
confidence: 99%