2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-015-1090-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain-dependent response to Cu2+ in the expression of laccase in Pycnoporus coccineus

Abstract: The effects of Cu(2+) on the activity and expression of laccase were investigated in seven different strains of Pycnoporus coccineus collected from different regions in Korea. Cu(2+) was toxic to mycelial growth at concentrations greater than 0.5 mM CuSO4 and showed complete growth inhibition at 1 mM in the liquid culture. However, Cu(2+) significantly upregulated the extracellular laccase activity at 0.2 mM in five strains of P. coccineus, IUM4209, IUM0032, IUM0450, IUM0470, and IUM4093, whereas two strains, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fonseca et al (2010) reported an increase in laccase production by P. sanguineus in the presence of 500 µM copper. Park et al (2015) verified that the addition of up to 200 µM copper affected laccase production in five of seven strains of Pycnoporus coccineus. These authors also verified that even though all strains had at least one laccase gene (lcc1) two strains did not respond to copper stimulation, maintaining constitutive enzymatic production without an increase in the transcription rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fonseca et al (2010) reported an increase in laccase production by P. sanguineus in the presence of 500 µM copper. Park et al (2015) verified that the addition of up to 200 µM copper affected laccase production in five of seven strains of Pycnoporus coccineus. These authors also verified that even though all strains had at least one laccase gene (lcc1) two strains did not respond to copper stimulation, maintaining constitutive enzymatic production without an increase in the transcription rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These authors also verified that even though all strains had at least one laccase gene (lcc1) two strains did not respond to copper stimulation, maintaining constitutive enzymatic production without an increase in the transcription rate. This suggests that the inducing role of copper in the laccase activity of P. sanguineus is directly related to the ability of different strains to adapt to environmental conditions (Park et al, 2015), and an evaluation of potential inducers is necessary for each specific situation and strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cu 2+ ions are thus crucial for the synthesis of catalytically active laccase protein. Further, Cu 2+ ions also induce the expression of certain genes including laccase gene [44]. The promoter region of the genes encoding for laccase contains various recognition sites specific for xenobiotics and heavy metals [3, 45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Não há até o momento, dados sobre a regulação gênica de lacase em P. sanguineus, porém, observações feitas para outras espécies do gênero Pycnoporus sugerem que a regulação da expressão difere ente linhagens. Para P. coccineus a adição de cobre (200 µM) aumentou a produção de lacase de cinco dentre sete linhagens analisadas (PARK et al, 2015). Todavia, os autores verificaram que, mesmo todas as linhagens apresentando ao menos um gene de lacase (lcc1), duas linhagens não responderam à indução com cobre.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Todavia, os autores verificaram que, mesmo todas as linhagens apresentando ao menos um gene de lacase (lcc1), duas linhagens não responderam à indução com cobre. Isso permite sugerir que a resposta de P. sanguineus ao cobre também possa estar relacionada com a capacidade de diferentes linhagens adaptarem-se às condições ambientais exigindo que possí-veis indutores sejam avaliados em cada situação específica de cultivo e para cada linhagem (PARK et al, 2015;MARIM et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified