2006
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-006-9152-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain analysis of wood components by close range photogrammetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the high accuracy, the close-range photogrammetry offers a possibility of non-contact measurements, a possibility to monitor a wide network of points without any additional cost and applicability in a wide range of engineering situations. Multi-and single-camera close-range photogrammetry systems were applied to measurement of static (Franke et al 2006;Jiang et al 2008;Lee and Al-Mahaidi 2008;Ye et al 2011) and dynamic deflections (Qi et al 2014) of various civil engineering structures, capturing vibration (Ryall and Fraser 2002) and buckling (Bambach 2009) modes, assessment of thermal deformations (Fraser and Riedel 2000) and automatic fracture monitoring (Valença et al 2012). It is also used in laboratory experiments for displacement and strain measurements (Shufrin et al 2016).…”
Section: Close-range Photogrammetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the high accuracy, the close-range photogrammetry offers a possibility of non-contact measurements, a possibility to monitor a wide network of points without any additional cost and applicability in a wide range of engineering situations. Multi-and single-camera close-range photogrammetry systems were applied to measurement of static (Franke et al 2006;Jiang et al 2008;Lee and Al-Mahaidi 2008;Ye et al 2011) and dynamic deflections (Qi et al 2014) of various civil engineering structures, capturing vibration (Ryall and Fraser 2002) and buckling (Bambach 2009) modes, assessment of thermal deformations (Fraser and Riedel 2000) and automatic fracture monitoring (Valença et al 2012). It is also used in laboratory experiments for displacement and strain measurements (Shufrin et al 2016).…”
Section: Close-range Photogrammetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous experience of its use on timber include Choi et al (1991) who analysed video taken of painted wood/paper samples under load with a microscope. Franke et al (2007) used timber coated with white wax film, with the addition of specific measurement points, although this does not provide as clear a picture of timber fibre behaviour as observing the actual timber surface. Thus both Franke et al (2007) and Choi et al (1991) applied a film coating and monitored specific target points; however, this does not exploit the whole benefit of full-field photogrammetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Franke et al (2007) used timber coated with white wax film, with the addition of specific measurement points, although this does not provide as clear a picture of timber fibre behaviour as observing the actual timber surface. Thus both Franke et al (2007) and Choi et al (1991) applied a film coating and monitored specific target points; however, this does not exploit the whole benefit of full-field photogrammetry. Godara et al (2009) used digital image correlation (DIC) to observe structural integrity of a composite material reinforced by natural wood fibres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent research in this direction can be found in Macareno et al where photogrammetry was used as a measuring tool in the analysis of the behaviour of a variable geometry structure [13]. Franke et al demonstrated how photogrammetry shows a clear increase in the significance of strain distributions compared with conventional methods [14]. Arias et al presented an approach to structural analysis based on photogrammetric models [15], and finally Schueremans and Van Genechten obtained the geometrical safety factor by limit analysis based on a terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) geometry survey of masonry vaults [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%