2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2017.448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Straight to Shapes: Real-Time Detection of Encoded Shapes

Abstract: Current object detection approaches predict bounding boxes that provide little instance-specific information beyond location, scale and aspect ratio. In this work, we propose to regress directly to objects' shapes in addition to their bounding boxes and categories. It is crucial to find an appropriate shape representation that is compact and decodable, and in which objects can be compared for higherorder concepts such as view similarity, pose variation and occlusion. To achieve this, we use a denoising convolu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To that end, we use star-convex polygons that we find well-suited to approximate the typically roundish shapes of cell nuclei in microscopy images. While Jetley et al [7] already investigated star-convex polygons for object detection in natural images, they found them to be inferior to more suitable shape representations for typical object classes in natural images, like people or bicycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To that end, we use star-convex polygons that we find well-suited to approximate the typically roundish shapes of cell nuclei in microscopy images. While Jetley et al [7] already investigated star-convex polygons for object detection in natural images, they found them to be inferior to more suitable shape representations for typical object classes in natural images, like people or bicycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach aiming at zero-shot segmentation is to learn a shape space shared with the novel objects. This technique, however, can only segment new object shapes that are very similar to the training set [16]. Along the second theme, some efforts have more recently been reported for object localization and tracking using natural language descriptions [14,26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explicit v.s Implicit Shape Representation A previous work with similar ideology has been done by Jetley et al [16]. They took the implicit shape representation path by first training an autoencoder on object binary mask.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first compare the explicit shape encoding with the implicit shape encoding. As the previous work [16] provides a baseline for implicit shape representation with YOLO [30] as the base detector, to be fairly compared, we also trained the ESE-Seg with YOLO base detector, the dimension of the shape vector is also the same. We denote the model as "YOLO-Cheby (50)" and "YOLO-Cheby (20)".…”
Section: Explicit Vs Implicitmentioning
confidence: 99%