1995
DOI: 10.1080/00908329509546053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Straddling stocks and highly migratory stocks in Latin American practice and legislation: New perspectives in light of current international negotiations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding the compromise reached at UNCLOS III, it seems unlikely that this latest iteration of the industrial capitalist dual-zone regulatory regime will be more durable than any of its predecessors. Even before ratification of the 1982 Law of the Sea was complete, the United Nations was convening a Conference on the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, where some states were proposing the establishment of a framework for managing select areas of the sea outside EEZs in order to prevent dcepwater fishing states from taking more than their 'fair share' of fish species that migrated among EEZs or between an EEZ and the high seas (Armas Pfirter, 1995;Orrcgo Vicuna, 1993). In response to such conflicts, ocean-policy professionals have promoted a number of further modifications of the existing regime.…”
Section: The Historical Geography Of Ocean Space: a Tale Of Capital Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding the compromise reached at UNCLOS III, it seems unlikely that this latest iteration of the industrial capitalist dual-zone regulatory regime will be more durable than any of its predecessors. Even before ratification of the 1982 Law of the Sea was complete, the United Nations was convening a Conference on the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, where some states were proposing the establishment of a framework for managing select areas of the sea outside EEZs in order to prevent dcepwater fishing states from taking more than their 'fair share' of fish species that migrated among EEZs or between an EEZ and the high seas (Armas Pfirter, 1995;Orrcgo Vicuna, 1993). In response to such conflicts, ocean-policy professionals have promoted a number of further modifications of the existing regime.…”
Section: The Historical Geography Of Ocean Space: a Tale Of Capital Mmentioning
confidence: 99%