2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storybuilder—A tool for the analysis of accident reports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include "Tripod" (Pietersen, 2006), the "Danish Safety Organization analysis method" (Jørgensen, 2011) and the "Dutch Storybuilder" (Bellamy, et al, 2007). However, it seems that only large companies with a dedicated safety department have the ability to put such methods to use.…”
Section: Accident Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include "Tripod" (Pietersen, 2006), the "Danish Safety Organization analysis method" (Jørgensen, 2011) and the "Dutch Storybuilder" (Bellamy, et al, 2007). However, it seems that only large companies with a dedicated safety department have the ability to put such methods to use.…”
Section: Accident Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date the project has analyzed more than 20,000 occupational accidents with serious injuries using the "Storybuilder" methodology (Bellamy, et al, 2007). The analysis used the software Storybuilder to capture the richness of the data in a graphical bowtie structure.…”
Section: : Safety Barrier Knowledge and Info Cardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this proved to be counterproductive. The analysis of all ladder and scaffold accidents combined with a nationwide inventory of the number of missions on ladders and scaffolds and the duration of these missions showed that in fact the use of scaffolds for many applications was more risky than the use of ladders (Bellamy et al 2007). The use of the data of all exposures to a risky activity including the circumstances is another example of the use of big data, although here the data were not even available at the time and needed to be generated in a nationwide survey among the Dutch labour force.…”
Section: Evaluating Accidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only because of the mission survey, which investigated all missions with ladders and not only those where an accident happened, it appeared that it made no difference at all whether the ladders used had an EU certificate or not. There were as many uncertified ladders in the missions that did not result in an accident as in the missions that did (Bellamy et al, 2007).…”
Section: Evaluating Accidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model consists of quantified logical bow-ties, which were founded on the analysis of the most serious occupational accidents, together with a survey in 2006 of the population exposure, to provide risk rates for the different occupational accident hazards [7]. The analysed accident data are contained in 36 accident bow-tie models using tailor-made software, which employs a unique approach using a graphical interface for data entry and review [8]. There are 23 030 serious reportable occupational accidents over 1998-2009 entered into the models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%