2016
DOI: 10.18261/issn.2464-3076-2016-04-02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Større forvaltningsreformer og udfordringerne ved instrumentel læring: - En analyse af evalueringen af Nav-reformen

Abstract: Professor, Aalborg Universitet, mbh@dps.aau.dk I 2005 blev Nav-reformen, en af de største forvaltningsreformer i Norge i nyere tid, vedtaget af det norske Storting. Det blev samtidig besluttet, at der parallelt med reformen skulle gennemføres en evaluering. Den havde flere målsaetninger bl.a. at understøtte og korrigere implementeringen af Navreformen. Artiklen forholder sig kritisk til den udbredte ambition om, at evalueringer kan anvendes i praktiske handlesituationer og indkredser de saerlige udfordringer, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interviews have been transcribed. An analysis of the data has been published previously in Danish and Norwegian (Breidahl et al, 2014; Breidahl, Gjelstrup, Hansen, & Hansen, 2015; Gjelstrup & Hansen, 2014; M. B. Hansen, Breidahl, Halvorsen, et al, 2015).…”
Section: Research Design Empirical Material and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interviews have been transcribed. An analysis of the data has been published previously in Danish and Norwegian (Breidahl et al, 2014; Breidahl, Gjelstrup, Hansen, & Hansen, 2015; Gjelstrup & Hansen, 2014; M. B. Hansen, Breidahl, Halvorsen, et al, 2015).…”
Section: Research Design Empirical Material and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, three were members of the committee responsible for conducting the evaluation, and one was a member of one of the four subgroups responsible for the interim reports, which formed part of the input that led to the overall report. The interview guides consisted of a range of themes, including process, organization, results, outcomes, utilization, and administrative follow-up (Breidahl, Furubo, Halvorsen, & Hansen, 2014; Gjelstrup & Hansen, 2014). The interviews have been transcribed.…”
Section: Research Design Empirical Material and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%